Treatment of patients with essential hypertension and microalbuminuria
- PMID: 9421693
- DOI: 10.2165/00003495-199754060-00005
Treatment of patients with essential hypertension and microalbuminuria
Abstract
There has been increasing interest in the question of whether microalbuminuria can be used in the risk stratification of patients with essential hypertension. A cluster of cardiovascular and/or renal risk factors may be associated with microalbuminuria in hypertension. Despite this, prospective data about the potential role of microalbuminuria as a prognostic marker of cardiovascular and/or renal risk have been sparse and inconclusive until now. Blood pressure values have been considered the most important determinant of microalbuminuria in essential hypertension; however, hyperinsulinaemia--a metabolic component-was noted to be present in conjunction with high blood pressure. Furthermore, 2 other factors may be also related to microalbuminuria: salt sensitivity and renal structural changes (nephrosclerosis). We are now aware that the clinical and physiological implications of abnormal urinary albumin excretion (UAE) are much broader than anticipated, possibly involving haemodynamic, metabolic and vascular components overlapping several clinical syndromes. Achievement of short term UAE reduction with antihypertensive treatment depends on structural abnormalities established in the glomerulus, the extent of blood pressure reduction and the antihypertensive drug class used. In terms of UAE reduction, better results are obtained with ACE inhibitors or angiotensin II antagonists such as losartan and valsartan, than with other antihypertensive classes, although their true impact in preserving renal function needs to be assessed. The capacity of new calcium antagonists, such as amlodipine, lacidipine or mibefradil, to reduce UAE also needs to be assessed further. Thus, microalbuminuria may be seen as an integrated marker of risk and should be assessed in recently diagnosed patients with essential hypertension. In microalbuminuric patients, the target should be to decrease blood pressure < 135/85 mm Hg, reduce salt intake to around 100 mmol/day and prescribe a low-calorie diet if obesity is present. ACE inhibitors or angiotensin II antagonists have more potential benefits than the other classes of antihypertensive drugs in reducing UAE. Finally, a yearly assessment of microalbuminuria is recommended during treatment, to monitor the impact of therapy.
Similar articles
-
Hypertension and microalbuminuria: the new detrimental duo.Blood Press. 2004;13(4):198-211. doi: 10.1080/08037050410016456. Blood Press. 2004. PMID: 15581333 Review.
-
Microalbuminuria and hypertension.Minerva Med. 2005 Aug;96(4):261-75. Minerva Med. 2005. PMID: 16179893 Review.
-
Influence of microalbuminuria in achieving blood pressure goals.Curr Opin Nephrol Hypertens. 2008 Sep;17(5):457-63. doi: 10.1097/MNH.0b013e328309a497. Curr Opin Nephrol Hypertens. 2008. PMID: 18695385 Review.
-
[Factors associated with changes in microalbuminuria during antihypertensive treatment].Med Clin (Barc). 2000 May 20;114(19):721-5. doi: 10.1016/s0025-7753(00)71414-x. Med Clin (Barc). 2000. PMID: 10919124 Spanish.
-
Microalbuminuria in essential hypertension.Curr Opin Nephrol Hypertens. 1999 May;8(3):359-63. doi: 10.1097/00041552-199905000-00014. Curr Opin Nephrol Hypertens. 1999. PMID: 10456269 Review.
Cited by
-
End-organ protection in patients with hypertension: focus on the role of angiotensin receptor blockers on renal function.Drugs. 2011 May 28;71(8):1003-17. doi: 10.2165/11591350-000000000-00000. Drugs. 2011. PMID: 21668039 Review.
References
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Miscellaneous