Bilateral transvaginal sacrospinous colpopexy: preliminary experience
- PMID: 9423735
- DOI: 10.1016/s0002-9378(97)70075-9
Bilateral transvaginal sacrospinous colpopexy: preliminary experience
Abstract
Objective: Our goal was to determine how often a transvaginal sacrospinous colpopexy procedure can be done bilaterally.
Study design: Between August 1993 and July 1996, 66 patients were prospectively evaluated for uterine prolapse (19 patients) and posthysterectomy vaginal vault prolapse (47 patients). Twenty-six patients (25 with posthysterectomy vaginal vault prolapse) underwent an abdominal sacral colpopexy. The remaining 40 patients (18 with uterine prolapse, 22 with posthysterectomy vaginal vault prolapse) were preoperatively and intraoperatively assessed for a bilateral sacrospinous colpopexy. All patients with uterine prolapse underwent hysterectomy.
Results: In 10 of the 18 (56%) patients with uterine prolapse and in 16 of the 22 (73%) patients with posthysterectomy vaginal vault prolapse, bilateral suspension to the sacrospinous ligament was carried out. Follow-up has ranged from 6 to 40 months, and no recurrent vaginal cuff prolapses have been detected in any patients. In 3 patients, however, all in the bilateral fixation categories, distention cystoceles have developed; one patient has undergone a successful anterior colporrhaphy.
Conclusions: The bilateral suspension is different from the unilateral suspension in that the former requires significant intraoperative judgment in its feasibility and in maintaining the width of the vaginal cuff to allow a bilateral suspension without tension. A bilateral fixation appears more attainable in a patient with posthysterectomy vaginal vault prolapse than in one with uterine prolapse.
Similar articles
-
[Application of transvaginal sacrospinous colpopexy in the treatment of pelvic organs prolapse].Vojnosanit Pregl. 2005 Sep;62(9):637-43. doi: 10.2298/vsp0509637a. Vojnosanit Pregl. 2005. PMID: 16229205 Serbian.
-
Transvaginal sacrospinous colpopexy for vault and marked uterovaginal prolapse.Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 1994 Jun;101(6):536-40. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.1994.tb13158.x. Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 1994. PMID: 8018646
-
Transvaginal sacrospinous colpopexy for marked uterovaginal and vault prolapse.Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2001 Aug;74(2):165-70. doi: 10.1016/s0020-7292(01)00420-9. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2001. PMID: 11502296
-
Vaginal vault prolapse.Br J Hosp Med. 1994 Apr 20-May 3;51(8):417-20. Br J Hosp Med. 1994. PMID: 8081581 Review.
-
Transvaginal repair of vault prolapse: a review.Obstet Gynecol. 1997 Mar;89(3):466-75. doi: 10.1016/S0029-7844(96)00337-7. Obstet Gynecol. 1997. PMID: 9052607 Review.
Cited by
-
Is standardised vaginal sacrospinous ligament fixation a safe teaching procedure for residents?Int Urogynecol J. 2011 Mar;22(3):293-8. doi: 10.1007/s00192-010-1341-8. Epub 2010 Dec 10. Int Urogynecol J. 2011. PMID: 21153470
-
Bilateral sacrospinous fixation without hysterectomy: 18-month follow-up.J Turk Ger Gynecol Assoc. 2015 Jun 1;16(2):102-6. doi: 10.5152/jtgga.2015.15220. eCollection 2015. J Turk Ger Gynecol Assoc. 2015. PMID: 26097393 Free PMC article.
-
Comparison of Unilateral and Bilateral Sacrospinous Ligament Fixation Using Minimally Invasive Anchorage.Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd. 2019 Sep;79(9):976-982. doi: 10.1055/a-0846-5726. Epub 2019 Sep 11. Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd. 2019. PMID: 31523098 Free PMC article.
-
The effectiveness of the sacrospinous hysteropexy for the primary treatment of uterovaginal prolapse.Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct. 2007 Nov;18(11):1271-6. doi: 10.1007/s00192-007-0336-6. Epub 2007 Mar 24. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct. 2007. PMID: 17384894
-
Laparoscopic sacrospinous ligament fixation for uterovaginal prolapse: experience with 93 cases.Int Urogynecol J. 2011 Jan;22(1):83-9. doi: 10.1007/s00192-010-1232-z. Epub 2010 Aug 26. Int Urogynecol J. 2011. PMID: 20740359
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical