[Value of MR tomography in inconclusive mammography findings]
- PMID: 9424615
- DOI: 10.1007/s001170050271
[Value of MR tomography in inconclusive mammography findings]
Abstract
Purpose: To evaluate the usefulness of magnetic resonance (MR) imaging in the assessment of inconclusive findings at mammography, such as indeterminate focal or diffuse breast abnormalities, post-treatment breasts with extensive scarring, dense breasts, and findings suggesting multifocal or multicentric breast cancer.
Material and methods: 254 patients underwent mammography, sonography, and MRI of the breast. Dynamic MR imaging was done using a thin-section three-dimensional gradient-echo sequence (FLASH, TR = 11.8 ms; TE = 5 ms; flip angle = 25 degrees) which was applied in a dynamic fashion before and every 90 seconds after injection of gadopentetate dimeglumine. Diagnoses were confirmed at biopsy (n = 165) or by follow-up (n = 89).
Results: Among various breast anomalies, the highest proportion of breast cancers was associated with dense breast tissue (27.8%), architectural distortion (26.9%), and irregular scars (15.8%). Sensitivity of dynamic MR imaging was 93.7%, and specificity was 83.3%. As compared to mammography and sonography, MR detected 6 occult carcinomas, and showed additional malignant lesions in 19/63 women (30.2%) with biopsy-proven breast cancer.
Conclusion: MR imaging of the breast may provide valuable additional information in indeterminate breast anomalies. However, because of its inherent limitations, it should not replace core needle biopsy in all lesions which are amenable to biopsy. Because of its high sensitivity in the detection of invasive carcinomas in any type of breast tissue, MR imaging is considered the modality of choice in the evaluation of dense breasts in high-risk patients or in patients with clinical suspicion of occult breast cancer, and for preoperative tumor staging.
Similar articles
-
Multifocal, multicentric and contralateral breast cancers: breast MR imaging in the preoperative evaluation of patients with newly diagnosed breast cancer.Radiol Med. 2011 Dec;116(8):1226-38. doi: 10.1007/s11547-011-0704-7. Epub 2011 Jul 9. Radiol Med. 2011. PMID: 21744256 English, Italian.
-
Diagnostic accuracy of mammography, clinical examination, US, and MR imaging in preoperative assessment of breast cancer.Radiology. 2004 Dec;233(3):830-49. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2333031484. Epub 2004 Oct 14. Radiology. 2004. PMID: 15486214
-
CE-Magnetic Resonance Mammography for the evaluation of the contralateral breast in patients with diagnosed breast cancer.Radiol Med. 2005 Jul-Aug;110(1-2):61-8. Radiol Med. 2005. PMID: 16163140 English, Italian.
-
[MR-mammography: current status and perspectives].Aktuelle Radiol. 1996 May;6(3):130-5. Aktuelle Radiol. 1996. PMID: 8679736 Review. German.
-
MR is/is not a useful diagnostic tool for breast cancer management.Acta Chir Belg. 2007 Jun;107(3):267-70. doi: 10.1080/00015458.2007.11680054. Acta Chir Belg. 2007. PMID: 17685251 Review. No abstract available.
Cited by
-
[Breast cancer. Sonography and magnetic resonance mammography].Radiologe. 2004 Jun;44(6):621-37; quiz 638-9. doi: 10.1007/s00117-004-1064-2. Radiologe. 2004. PMID: 15221062 German.
-
MRI in the differential diagnosis of primary architectural distortion detected by mammography.Diagn Interv Radiol. 2016 Mar-Apr;22(2):141-50. doi: 10.5152/dir.2016.15017. Diagn Interv Radiol. 2016. PMID: 26899149 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Research Materials