Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 1997 Nov-Dec;NS37(6):647-61.
doi: 10.1016/s1086-5802(16)30281-9.

Therapeutic outcomes monitoring: application of pharmaceutical care guidelines to community pharmacy

Affiliations

Therapeutic outcomes monitoring: application of pharmaceutical care guidelines to community pharmacy

T J Grainger-Rousseau et al. J Am Pharm Assoc (Wash). 1997 Nov-Dec.

Abstract

Objective: To design a pharmaceutical care model, and develop and field test a set of community pharmacy guidelines and practice support materials--Therapeutic Outcomes Monitoring (TOM) modules.

Design: Concept interviews with pharmacists, physicians, and patients; development and field testing of practice guidelines.

Setting: Community pharmacies.

Participants: Five independent, five chain, and two clinic site pharmacies.

Interventions: A prototype TOM module for asthma was developed through a seven-step process. Concept interviews were held with pharmacists, physicians, and patients to determine the desirability and feasibility of the TOM concept, prototype, and materials. Two field tests were completed and modifications made. Results were gathered through further concept interviews at the completion of the second field tests.

Main outcome measures: Participants' opinions and experiences.

Results: Pharmacists, physicians, and patients expressed favorable attitudes about community pharmacists' participation in this pharmaceutical care model. Of the 12 participating pharmacists, 7 successfully implemented TOM in their practice sites and participated in the project throughout the testing; 49 patients were recruited into the study; and 22 patients remained in the program at the end of the second field test. In providing TOM services to these patients, the two most problematic areas for the pharmacists were in documenting care and reporting to physicians. A final phase of the TOM project has not been conducted in the United States because of insufficient numbers of patients for evaluating patient outcomes.

Conclusion: The TOM project was successful from a technical but not a marketing perspective. Useful practice guidelines can be written and taught to pharmacists. Enrollment of patients was difficult, and the concept is not likely to spread spontaneously within the existing market for pharmaceutical services.

PubMed Disclaimer

Comment in

Publication types