A prospective, double-blind, randomized study on the use of a topical anesthetic, vasoconstrictor, and placebo during transnasal flexible fiberoptic endoscopy
- PMID: 9430755
- DOI: 10.1044/jslhr.4006.1352
A prospective, double-blind, randomized study on the use of a topical anesthetic, vasoconstrictor, and placebo during transnasal flexible fiberoptic endoscopy
Abstract
The purpose of the present study was to compare patient comfort levels following administration of a topical anesthetic, vasoconstrictor, placebo, or nothing to the nasal mucosa prior to flexible fiberoptic transnasal endoscopy. Using a prospective, double-blind, randomized design, 152 consecutive patients were randomly assigned to receive a topical anesthetic (N = 54), vasoconstrictor (N = 50), or placebo (N = 48). No significant differences were found among the three variables. An additional 50 consecutive patients had endoscopy performed without administration of any substance to the nares, and no significant differences were found among the four variables (N = 202). It was concluded that speech-language pathologists can perform independent and comfortable transnasal endoscopy without administration of any substance to the nasal mucosa. Flexible fiberoptic endoscopy, however, should be performed by experienced clinicians with care taken to examine visually the patency of both nares for ease and comfort of scope insertion.
Similar articles
-
A prospective, randomized, double-blind study comparing the efficacy of topical anesthetics in nasal endoscopy.Laryngoscope. 2013 Apr;123(4):852-8. doi: 10.1002/lary.23966. Epub 2013 Feb 12. Laryngoscope. 2013. PMID: 23404424 Clinical Trial.
-
Effects of topical nasal anesthetic on fiberoptic endoscopic examination of swallowing with sensory testing (FEESST).Dysphagia. 2014 Feb;29(1):33-43. doi: 10.1007/s00455-013-9473-x. Epub 2013 Jul 5. Dysphagia. 2014. PMID: 23828313 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
Intranasal topical local anesthetic and decongestant for flexible nasendoscopy in children: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial.JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2013 Dec;139(12):1301-5. doi: 10.1001/jamaoto.2013.5297. JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2013. PMID: 24158493 Clinical Trial.
-
Is cocaine a safe topical agent for use during endoscopic sinus surgery?Laryngoscope. 2016 Aug;126(8):1721-3. doi: 10.1002/lary.25836. Epub 2016 Apr 14. Laryngoscope. 2016. PMID: 27075241 Review. No abstract available.
-
Is topical epinephrine safe for hemostasis in endoscopic sinus surgery?Laryngoscope. 2019 Jan;129(1):1-3. doi: 10.1002/lary.27238. Epub 2018 May 14. Laryngoscope. 2019. PMID: 29756219 Review. No abstract available.
Cited by
-
Can an oral mechanism examination contribute to the assessment of odds of aspiration?Dysphagia. 2013 Sep;28(3):370-4. doi: 10.1007/s00455-012-9442-9. Epub 2013 Jan 5. Dysphagia. 2013. PMID: 23292501 Clinical Trial.
-
Decision aid and preference assessment of topical anesthesia for otolaryngology procedures.Laryngoscope Investig Otolaryngol. 2021 Jun 25;6(4):794-799. doi: 10.1002/lio2.604. eCollection 2021 Aug. Laryngoscope Investig Otolaryngol. 2021. PMID: 34401504 Free PMC article.
-
Promoting safe swallowing when puree is swallowed without aspiration but thin liquid is aspirated: nectar is enough.Dysphagia. 2013 Mar;28(1):58-62. doi: 10.1007/s00455-012-9412-2. Epub 2012 Jun 27. Dysphagia. 2013. PMID: 22736260 Clinical Trial.
-
Answering orientation questions and following single-step verbal commands: effect on aspiration status.Dysphagia. 2009 Sep;24(3):290-5. doi: 10.1007/s00455-008-9204-x. Epub 2009 Mar 5. Dysphagia. 2009. PMID: 19263106
-
Laryngeal somatosensory deficits in Parkinson's disease: implications for speech respiratory and phonatory control.Exp Brain Res. 2010 Mar;201(3):401-9. doi: 10.1007/s00221-009-2048-2. Epub 2009 Dec 15. Exp Brain Res. 2010. PMID: 20012947 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical