Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Clinical Trial
. 1998 Jan 3;351(9095):19-23.
doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(97)06250-8.

Randomised controlled trial to assess acceptability of phenobarbital for childhood epilepsy in rural India

Affiliations
Clinical Trial

Randomised controlled trial to assess acceptability of phenobarbital for childhood epilepsy in rural India

D K Pal et al. Lancet. .

Abstract

Background: The use of phenobarbital for childhood epilepsy is controversial because of reported behavioural side-effects; however, whether this research can validly be extrapolated to developing countries is not clear. We undertook a randomised comparison of phenobarbital and phenytoin to assess the acceptability and efficacy of phenobarbital as monotherapy for childhood epilepsy in rural India.

Methods: Between August, 1995, and February, 1996, 109 unselected children aged 2-18 years with partial and generalised tonic-clonic epilepsy were identified by population screening. 15 families declined to take part. 94 children were randomly allocated treatment with phenobarbital (1.5 mg/kg daily for 2 weeks; maintenance dose 3.0 mg/kg daily; n = 47) or phenytoin (2.5 mg/kg daily then 5.0 mg/kg daily; n = 47). Children were followed up for 12 months. The primary outcome measure was the frequency of behavioural side-effects; behaviour was assessed by the Conners parent rating scale for children aged 6 years and older, and by the preschool behaviour screening questionnaire (BSQ) for those aged 2-5 years, at 12 months or at withdrawal from treatment. Analysis was by intention to treat.

Findings: The mean log-transformed scores on the behaviour rating scales did not differ significantly between the phenobarbital and phenytoin groups (Conners 2.64 [SD 0.71] vs 2.65 [0.89], p = 0.97; n = 32 in each group: BSQ 2.12 [1.31] vs 2.18 [1.02], p = 0.94; n = 4 vs 3). The odds ratio for behavioural problems (phenobarbital vs phenytoin) was 0.51 (95% CI 0.16-1.59). There was no excess in parental reports of side-effects for phenobarbital. We found no difference in efficacy between the study drugs (adjusted hazard ratio for time to first seizure from randomisation 0.97 [0.28-3.30]).

Interpretation: This evidence supports the acceptability of phenobarbital as a first-line drug for childhood epilepsy in rural settings in developing countries.

PIP: The acceptability and efficacy of phenobarbital treatment for childhood epilepsy was evaluated in 94 children from rural India with partial and generalized tonic-clonic epilepsy. Children were randomly assigned to receive wither 1.5 mg/kg of phenobarbital daily for 2 weeks, followed by a maintenance dose of 3.0 mg/kg daily, or 2.5 mg/kg daily of phenytoin, followed by a maintenance dose of 5.0 mg/kg daily for a total of 12 months. Behavioral side effects were assessed through use of the Conners parent rating scale for children 6 years of age and above and by the preschool behavioral screening questionnaire for younger children. The mean log-transformed scores on the behavior rating scales did not differ significantly between the phenobarbital and phenytoin groups. The frequency of behavioral problems was 30% in both treatment groups. The odds ratio for behavioral problems in the phenobarbital versus phenytoin groups was 0.51 (95% confidence interval, 0.16-1.59). Behavioral problems were more common among children with cerebral impairments, those under 5 years of age, and girls. Both study drugs were equally effective and 65% of children were seizure-free in the final quarter of treatment. These findings suggest that concerns about phenobarbital-related behavioral side effects may not be valid in developing countries and that this drug is an effective, acceptable anti-epileptic for rural Indian children.

PubMed Disclaimer

Comment in

Similar articles

Cited by

Publication types

MeSH terms