Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 1997;14(6):587-92.
doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1098-2272(1997)14:6<587::AID-GEPI6>3.0.CO;2-X.

Disease classification and transmission effects on linkage analyses in the NIMH1 bipolar disorder pedigrees

J S Collins  1 , R C Go
Affiliations

Disease classification and transmission effects on linkage analyses in the NIMH1 bipolar disorder pedigrees

J S Collins et al. Genet Epidemiol. 1997.

Abstract

In this analysis of bipolar affective disorder, 22 families from the NIMH1 data set were further grouped into three transmission patterns: male to male, male to female, and maternal. The data were analyzed under three classifications of affection status: Bipolar I (BPI) only, BPI and Bipolar II (BPII), and BPI, BPII, and recurrent unipolar. LINKAGE was run on each of the subsets, and SIBPAL was run on the full and grouped data sets. A lod score of 1.09 was found for marker D18S62 in the maternal subset, when classifying affecteds as BPI, BPII, or recurrent unipolar. Affected sib-pair analysis showed evidence for linkage with markers D18S62, D18S37, D18S53, D18S40, D18S45, and D18S56 in the male to male transmission groups and the full data set. Linkage was not consistently found in the maternal and father/daughter groups. These results indicate that subsetting by parental transmission may result in less heterogeneity and have significant effects on linkage findings. Studies using a broader definition of affection status may provide considerably more information for linkage.

PubMed Disclaimer

Publication types