Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 1997;15(6):346-58.
doi: 10.1007/BF01300182.

Stage T1c prostate cancer: defining the appropriate staging evaluation and the role for pelvic lymphadenectomy

Affiliations
Free article
Review

Stage T1c prostate cancer: defining the appropriate staging evaluation and the role for pelvic lymphadenectomy

M C Beduschi et al. World J Urol. 1997.
Free article

Abstract

A good staging system should be able to accurately reflect the natural history of a malignant disease, to express the extent of the disease at the time of diagnosis, and stratify patients in prognostically distinctive groups. The staging system for prostate cancer, as it is today, fails to fulfill these requirements. Approximately one third of the patients who undergo surgery for complete excision of prostate cancer in fact do not have a localize disease. The incidence of tumor at the inked margin may reach 30% for T1 stage and up to 60% for clinical T2b prostate cancer according to comparison with pathologic examination of resected specimen. Several concepts have been recently proposed as a means of improving the accuracy of the available staging system. In this paper, we review current aspects of clinical and pathological staging of prostate cancer, and the importance of these new concepts on the early stages of prostate cancer.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

References

    1. Cancer. 1995 Apr 1;75(7):1642-8 - PubMed
    1. J Urol. 1994 May;151(5):1315-20 - PubMed
    1. Am J Surg Pathol. 1993 Apr;17(4):336-41 - PubMed
    1. Eur Urol. 1992;22(4):281-7 - PubMed
    1. J Urol. 1995 Mar;153(3 Pt 2):993-9 - PubMed