The AutoPap 300 QC System multicenter clinical trials for use in quality control rescreening of cervical smears: I. A prospective intended use study
- PMID: 9438458
- DOI: 10.1002/(sici)1097-0142(19971225)81:6<337::aid-cncr7>3.0.co;2-i
The AutoPap 300 QC System multicenter clinical trials for use in quality control rescreening of cervical smears: I. A prospective intended use study
Abstract
Background: The AutoPap 300 QC System is an automated device for the analysis of conventionally prepared cervical cytology slides. The AutoPap System selects an enriched population of cases for human quality control (QC) review. The device assigns a score based on the likelihood that a slide is abnormal. Cases are selected for QC rescreening that have scores exceeding a preset threshold corresponding to approximately the top 10% (or greater) of scores.
Methods: AutoPap false-negative detection, compared with a 10% random QC process, was tested in a 6-center clinical evaluation study. At each site, a block of up to 150 consecutive negative slides (including detected false-negative cases) were selected randomly daily. All slides were run on the AutoPap System and rescreened by cytotechnologists for truth determination. The false-negative cases included in the top 10% group selected by AutoPap System then were compared with false-negative detection by the random selection process.
Results: Fourteen thousand nine hundred fourteen cases were analyzed. The AutoPap-enriched 10% quality control group contained false-negative cases at rates 3 to 5 times that of the random selection method (P < 0.01). The sensitivity for all false-negative cases was 35% and was 52% for false-negative cases at the level of low grade squamous intraepithelial lesion and higher.
Conclusions: The AutoPap 300 QC System provides the potential for a marked increase in the number of false-negative cervical cytology cases that can be detected on QC rescreening. A significant reduction in laboratory false-negative rates can be expected if this device is utilized in routine practice.
Similar articles
-
The AutoPap 300 QC System multicenter clinical trials for use in quality control rescreening of cervical smears: II. Prospective and archival sensitivity studies.Cancer. 1997 Dec 25;81(6):343-7. doi: 10.1002/(sici)1097-0142(19971225)81:6<343::aid-cncr8>3.0.co;2-m. Cancer. 1997. PMID: 9438459 Clinical Trial.
-
A feasibility study of the AutoPap system location-guided screening.Acta Cytol. 1998 Jan-Feb;42(1):221-6. doi: 10.1159/000331550. Acta Cytol. 1998. PMID: 9479344
-
The AutoPap system for primary screening in cervical cytology. Comparing the results of a prospective, intended-use study with routine manual practice.Acta Cytol. 1998 Jan-Feb;42(1):214-20. doi: 10.1159/000331549. Acta Cytol. 1998. PMID: 9479343 Clinical Trial.
-
Technologic advances for evaluation of cervical cytology: is newer better?Obstet Gynecol Surv. 2001 Dec;56(12):765-74. doi: 10.1097/00006254-200112000-00003. Obstet Gynecol Surv. 2001. PMID: 11753179 Review.
-
NeoPath, Inc. NeoPath AutoPap 300 Automatic Pap Screener System.Acta Cytol. 1996 Jan-Feb;40(1):45-52. doi: 10.1159/000333584. Acta Cytol. 1996. PMID: 8604574 Review. No abstract available.
Cited by
-
Proof-of-principle study of a novel cervical screening and triage strategy: Computer-analyzed cytology to decide which HPV-positive women are likely to have ≥CIN2.Int J Cancer. 2017 Feb 1;140(3):718-725. doi: 10.1002/ijc.30456. Epub 2016 Oct 17. Int J Cancer. 2017. PMID: 27696414 Free PMC article.
-
A Deep Learning Model for Cervical Cancer Screening on Liquid-Based Cytology Specimens in Whole Slide Images.Cancers (Basel). 2022 Feb 24;14(5):1159. doi: 10.3390/cancers14051159. Cancers (Basel). 2022. PMID: 35267466 Free PMC article.