Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 1997 Sep:48 Suppl 4:67-73.

Breath tests in Helicobacter pylori infection: methodological aspects

Affiliations
  • PMID: 9440057
Review

Breath tests in Helicobacter pylori infection: methodological aspects

M Peeters et al. J Physiol Pharmacol. 1997 Sep.

Abstract

The urea breath test (*C-UBT) is generally considered as a simple, non-invasive and accurate test to demonstrate Helicobacter pylori (Hp) infection. Sensitivity and specificity vary between 95-100%. Some authors even claim that this test should be considered 'gold standard' for the detection of active Hp infection. Although today many centres already use this test in clinical praxis, there exists no uniformity in test protocol. Most modifications recently published in literature, had only minor impact on the accuracy of the test. More important than 'inventing' the n'th *C-UBT, there is a need for a consensus on features such as: which isotope, is a test meal necessary and which one should be used, what is the appropriate urea dose, how many breath samples should be taken and at what time interval, is there a difference between children and adults, what is the most appropriate method to differentiate between buccal and stomach urease activity. Even the expression of the cut-off value has to be defined. Ideally, the answers should result in one *C-UBT which can be used in research and clinical practice. In conclusion, *C-UBT is a simple, non-invasive and accurate test to demonstrate H. pylori infection. To make results comparable there is an absolute need for standardisation in methodology.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles