Do the integrases of LTR-retrotransposons and class II element transposases have a common ancestor?
- PMID: 9440259
Do the integrases of LTR-retrotransposons and class II element transposases have a common ancestor?
Abstract
The integrases of retrotransposons (class I) and retroviruses and the transposases of bacterial type elements (class II) were compared. The DDE signature that is crucial for the integration of these elements is present in most of them, except for the non-LTR retrotransposons and members of the hAT and P super-families. Alignment of this region was used to infer the relationships between class II elements, retrotransposons, and retroviruses. The mariner-Tc1 and the Pogo-Fot1 super-families were found to be closely related and probably monophyletic, as were LTR retrotransposons and retroviruses. The IS elements of bacteria were clustered in several families, some of them being closely related to the transposase of the mariner-Tc1 super-family or to the LTR retrotransposon and retrovirus integrases. These results plus that of Xiong and Eickbush (1990) were used to develop an evolutionary history suggesting a common ancestral origin(s) for the integrases and transposases containing the DDE signature. The position of the telomeric elements (Het-A and TART) was assessed by comparing their gag and reverse transcriptase domains (when present) to those of group II introns and non-LTR retrotransposons. This preliminary analysis suggests that telomeric elements may be derived from non-LTR retrotransposons.
Similar articles
-
Relationships between transposable elements based upon the integrase-transposase domains: is there a common ancestor?J Mol Evol. 1996 Mar;42(3):359-68. doi: 10.1007/BF02337546. J Mol Evol. 1996. PMID: 8661997
-
Is the evolution of transposable elements modular?Genetica. 1999;107(1-3):15-25. Genetica. 1999. PMID: 10952194
-
Evidence of multiple retrotransposons in two litopenaeid species.Anim Genet. 2008 Aug;39(4):363-73. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2052.2008.01739.x. Epub 2008 Jun 28. Anim Genet. 2008. PMID: 18557973
-
DIRS-1 and the other tyrosine recombinase retrotransposons.Cytogenet Genome Res. 2005;110(1-4):575-88. doi: 10.1159/000084991. Cytogenet Genome Res. 2005. PMID: 16093711 Review.
-
Ribonuclease H evolution in retrotransposable elements.Cytogenet Genome Res. 2005;110(1-4):392-401. doi: 10.1159/000084971. Cytogenet Genome Res. 2005. PMID: 16093691 Review.
Cited by
-
Expanding the diversity of the IS630-Tc1-mariner superfamily: discovery of a unique DD37E transposon and reclassification of the DD37D and DD39D transposons.Genetics. 2001 Nov;159(3):1103-15. doi: 10.1093/genetics/159.3.1103. Genetics. 2001. PMID: 11729156 Free PMC article.
-
Ginger DNA transposons in eukaryotes and their evolutionary relationships with long terminal repeat retrotransposons.Mob DNA. 2010 Jan 25;1(1):3. doi: 10.1186/1759-8753-1-3. Mob DNA. 2010. PMID: 20226081 Free PMC article.
-
The RNase H-like superfamily: new members, comparative structural analysis and evolutionary classification.Nucleic Acids Res. 2014 Apr;42(7):4160-79. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkt1414. Epub 2014 Jan 23. Nucleic Acids Res. 2014. PMID: 24464998 Free PMC article.
-
Self-synthesizing DNA transposons in eukaryotes.Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2006 Mar 21;103(12):4540-5. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0600833103. Epub 2006 Mar 14. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2006. PMID: 16537396 Free PMC article.
-
Traveler, a New DD35E Family of Tc1/Mariner Transposons, Invaded Vertebrates Very Recently.Genome Biol Evol. 2020 Mar 1;12(3):66-76. doi: 10.1093/gbe/evaa034. Genome Biol Evol. 2020. PMID: 32068835 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Molecular Biology Databases