Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 1997 Nov;14(10):624-8.
doi: 10.1023/a:1022545121367.

A new method for the purification of human motile spermatozoa applying density-gradient centrifugation: polysucrose media compared to Percoll media

Affiliations
Comparative Study

A new method for the purification of human motile spermatozoa applying density-gradient centrifugation: polysucrose media compared to Percoll media

C Y Andersen et al. J Assist Reprod Genet. 1997 Nov.

Abstract

Purpose: A newly developed method for the isolation of human motile spermatozoa using density-gradient centrifugation was compared with the traditionally used Percoll technique.

Method: Sperm samples were divided into two equal aliquots, which were purified with either the traditionally performed Percoll technique or a new alternative based on polysucrose/Optiprep media. For each sample the isolation was performed during the same run of the centrifuge.

Results: The average recovery of progressively motile spermatozoa with the polysucrose/Optiprep method was significantly higher (48 +/- 7%) than with the Percoll method (38 +/- 6%) (n = 18). The average percentage of motile spermatozoa and the motility score were similar in the purified preparations.

Conclusions: The new polysucrose/Optiprep-based density-gradient centrifugation technique for the isolation of motile human spermatozoa is as good as the traditionally used Percoll method and may replace it in connection with assisted reproduction techniques.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

  • Sperm preparation for ART.
    Henkel RR, Schill WB. Henkel RR, et al. Reprod Biol Endocrinol. 2003 Nov 14;1:108. doi: 10.1186/1477-7827-1-108. Reprod Biol Endocrinol. 2003. PMID: 14617368 Free PMC article. Review.

References

    1. Mortimer D. Sperm preparation techniques and iatrogenic failures of in-vitro fertilization. Hum Reprod. 1991;6:173–176. - PubMed
    1. Lessley BA, Garner DL. Isolation of motile spermatozoa by density gradient centrifugation in Percoll. Gamete Res. 1983;7:49.
    1. Jaroudi KA, Carver-Ward JA, Hamilton CJCM, Sieck UV, Sheth KV. Percoll semen preparation in male-factor infertility as shown by a randomized cross-over study. Hum Reprod. 1993;8:1438–1342. - PubMed
    1. Aitken RJ. Pathophysiology of human spermatozoa. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol. 1994;6:128–135. - PubMed
    1. Aitken RJ, Clarkson JS. Significance of reactive oxygen species and antioxidants in defining the efficacy of sperm preparation techniques. J Androl. 1988;9:367–376. - PubMed

Publication types