The consultation and referral process. A report from NEON. Northeastern Ohio Network Research Group
- PMID: 9451370
The consultation and referral process. A report from NEON. Northeastern Ohio Network Research Group
Abstract
Background: Consultation and referral are essential components of the practice of primary care. Despite this, little is known about the factors that contribute to the success of a referral. We examined the short-term outcomes of communication between family physicians and consultants during the referral process.
Methods: The study setting was six family practice centers in northeastern Ohio. All eligible physicians at each center participated in data collection by means of a card study. Data was recorded on any patient who received a referral to a physician or nonphysician provider during the month of July 1994. One year later, referrals were followed up by physician questionnaire.
Results: Three hundred nine of 5172 total patients were referred (5.97 referrals per 100 office visits). At follow-up, the family physicians reported that 63% of patients had visited the consultant, 14% had not, and the physician had no knowledge of the actions taken by the other 23%. The referring physician received feedback from the consultant regarding 55% of the patients referred. Receipt of feedback was strongly related to communication by the family physician to the consultant at the time of referral. Physicians who received feedback were the most satisfied with communication from the consultant and the care their patient had received.
Conclusions: Primary care physicians can influence the likelihood of receiving feedback from a consultant by initiating communication with the consultant. A referral wherein the physicians involved do not communicate with one another results in physician dissatisfaction. Primary care physicians must practice strategies to improve the referral process.
Similar articles
-
Urgent self-referrals to ambulatory consultant--a prospective evaluation of triage by a qualified family physician.Isr J Med Sci. 1997 Nov;33(11):744-8. Isr J Med Sci. 1997. PMID: 9434812
-
Family physicians' referral decisions: results from the ASPN referral study.J Fam Pract. 2002 Mar;51(3):215-22. J Fam Pract. 2002. PMID: 11978231
-
How good is communication between primary care physicians and subspecialty consultants?Arch Intern Med. 1984 Jun;144(6):1265-8. Arch Intern Med. 1984. PMID: 6732382
-
Informational influences on physician referrals.J Hosp Mark. 1992;6(2):101-26. doi: 10.1300/J043v06n02_06. J Hosp Mark. 1992. PMID: 10122435 Review.
-
Children as patients: a communications process study in family practice.J Fam Pract. 1981 Nov;13(6):827-35. J Fam Pract. 1981. PMID: 7031173 Review.
Cited by
-
Specialty referral completion among primary care patients: results from the ASPN Referral Study.Ann Fam Med. 2007 Jul-Aug;5(4):361-7. doi: 10.1370/afm.703. Ann Fam Med. 2007. PMID: 17664503 Free PMC article.
-
Gatekeeping and referrals to cardiologists: general practitioners' views on interactive communications.Scand J Prim Health Care. 2013 Jun;31(2):79-82. doi: 10.3109/02813432.2013.784543. Epub 2013 Apr 23. Scand J Prim Health Care. 2013. PMID: 23607368 Free PMC article.
-
Quality of Referral Letters Written by Family Physicians to Otologists -A Peer Assessment.Iran J Otorhinolaryngol. 2019 Nov;31(107):369-375. doi: 10.22038/ijorl.2019.35908.2187. Iran J Otorhinolaryngol. 2019. PMID: 31857981 Free PMC article.
-
Communication with referring physicians in a palliative radiotherapy clinic.Support Care Cancer. 2004 Sep;12(9):669-73. doi: 10.1007/s00520-004-0643-0. Support Care Cancer. 2004. PMID: 15138865
-
Systems engineering analysis of diagnostic referral closed-loop processes.BMJ Open Qual. 2021 Nov;10(4):e001603. doi: 10.1136/bmjoq-2021-001603. BMJ Open Qual. 2021. PMID: 34844935 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources