Defending commercial surrogate motherhood against Van Niekerk and Van Zyl
- PMID: 9451602
- PMCID: PMC1377575
- DOI: 10.1136/jme.23.6.344
Defending commercial surrogate motherhood against Van Niekerk and Van Zyl
Abstract
The arguments of Van Niekerk and Van Zyl that, on the grounds that it involves an inappropriate commodification and alienation of women's labour, commercial surrogate motherhood (CSM) is morally suspect are discussed and considered to be defective. In addition, doubt is cast on the notion that CSM should be illegal.
Comment on
-
The ethics of surrogacy: women's reproductive labour.J Med Ethics. 1995 Dec;21(6):345-9. doi: 10.1136/jme.21.6.345. J Med Ethics. 1995. PMID: 8778458 Free PMC article.
References
-
- J Med Ethics. 1995 Dec;21(6):345-9 - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Miscellaneous