From audit to effectiveness: an historical evaluation of the changing role of Medical Audit Advisory Groups
- PMID: 9456424
- DOI: 10.1046/j.1365-2753.1997.t01-1-00001.x
From audit to effectiveness: an historical evaluation of the changing role of Medical Audit Advisory Groups
Abstract
MAAGs were introduced as a result of the 1989 White Paper 'Working for Patients', with the remit to direct, coordinate and monitor medical audit activities in general practice. They were funded through the new FHSA management budget and each MAAG was responsible to its own FHSA. They were accepted as a completely new institution as a part of the introduction of an innovative management structure in a reformed NHS. When viewed in an historical context, MAAGs can actually be seen as a part of an expanding culture of greater objectivity and critical analysis which has burgeoned in medical practice over the last two decades. Although MAAGs began with an educational role with uniprofessional medical audit, they have embraced multiprofessional clinical audit in primary care in the context of the wider aspects of quality in practice. The last 20 years have seen the development of clinical guidelines, evidence-based medicine and application of business management theory to clinical quality. All these have reflected the increasing demand for explicit standards of care which has also formed the basis of clinical audit and MAAG activity. MAAGs should be seen as an inevitable concomitant of this historical trend to improve the application of scientific rigour in medical practice. With the adoption of clinical effectiveness, incorporating all these themes, as one of the NHS Executive's six medium-term priority areas, MAAGs are uniquely placed to act as agents of change to enhance the quality of primary health care.
Similar articles
-
Developing role of medical audit advisory groups.Qual Health Care. 1993 Dec;2(4):232-8. doi: 10.1136/qshc.2.4.232. Qual Health Care. 1993. PMID: 10132457 Free PMC article.
-
The costs and benefits of asking patients for their opinions about general practice.Fam Pract. 1996 Feb;13(1):52-8. doi: 10.1093/fampra/13.1.52. Fam Pract. 1996. PMID: 8671104
-
Is ownership more important than the scientific credibility of audit protocols? A survey of medical audit advisory groups.Fam Pract. 1997 Apr;14(2):107-11. doi: 10.1093/fampra/14.2.107. Fam Pract. 1997. PMID: 9137947
-
Standards in the NHS.J R Soc Med. 2005 May;98(5):224-7. doi: 10.1258/jrsm.98.5.224. J R Soc Med. 2005. PMID: 15863772 Free PMC article. Review. No abstract available.
-
MAAGs (Medical Audit Advisory Groups): the Eli Lilly National Clinical Audit Centre.Int J Health Care Qual Assur. 1993;6(3):4-8. doi: 10.1108/09526869310038415. Int J Health Care Qual Assur. 1993. PMID: 10131445 Review.
Cited by
-
Decision making, evidence, audit, and education: case study of antibiotic prescribing in general practice.BMJ. 2000 Apr 22;320(7242):1114-8. doi: 10.1136/bmj.320.7242.1114. BMJ. 2000. PMID: 10775223 Free PMC article. Review.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources