Impact of the extent of parametrial involvement in patients with carcinoma of the uterine cervix

Abstract

Purpose: A scoring system is proposed to measure the extent of parametrial involvement and predict treatment outcome in patients with carcinoma of the uterine cervix.

Methods and materials: 244 patients with FIGO Stage IIB (n = 146) or IIIB (n = 98) carcinoma of the uterine cervix were treated by radical radiotherapy from October 1987 to June 1992. Impact of the extent of parametrial involvement on outcome was studied. All patients were scored by the newly introduced scoring system described as follows: score 1, tumor extending <1/2 the distance to the pelvic side wall; score 2, tumor extending >1/2 the distance to the pelvic side wall but not to pelvic side wall; score 3, tumor extending to the pelvic side wall. The score in each patient was defined as the sum of the scores of both the left and right parametrial tumor extent.

Results: There were 53, 47, 61, 34, 25, and 24 patients in score 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, and 6, respectively. All 244 patients were subdivided into three groups described as follows: score 1 and 2, group I; score 3 and 4, group II; score 5 and 6, group III. In univariate analysis, lower score groups had better overall survival rate (OS), disease-free survival rate (DFS), local control rate (LC), and distant metastasis-free rate (DMF) than higher score groups including groups I vs. II, II vs. III, or I vs. III. The differences were all statistically significant except for the difference of the DMF in group I vs. II. In multivariate analysis, score (range 1-6) was also statistically significant in OS (p < 0.0001), DFS (p = 0.0015), LC (p = 0.0032), and DMF (p = 0.0141).

Conclusions: The data suggested that the new scoring system defined by pelvic examination is a convenient, simple, and reliable method of measuring the degree of parametrial extension and predicting the outcome of patients with parametrial disease.