Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Clinical Trial
. 1997 Nov-Dec;88(6):380-2.
doi: 10.1007/BF03403910.

Cleaning solutions and bacterial colonization in promoting healing and early separation of the umbilical cord in healthy newborns

J M Medves  1 , B A O'Brien
Affiliations
Clinical Trial

Cleaning solutions and bacterial colonization in promoting healing and early separation of the umbilical cord in healthy newborns

J M Medves et al. Can J Public Health. 1997 Nov-Dec.

Abstract
in English, French

The efficacy of alcohol or water in promoting umbilical cord separation was compared in a randomized controlled trial. Rates of skin colonization between groups were also evaluated on three occasions. Time to cord separation, rates of colonization, and species of organisms that colonized were compared between groups. Of 148 participants, 136 (92%) completed the protocol. Cords that were cleaned with sterile water separated more quickly than those cleaned with alcohol (t = 3.15, p = 0.002). Between-group differences in colonization rates were not found (F = 1.59, df = 2, p = 0.205). Umbilical or other infections did not occur. Bacterial colonization of the umbilical area and surrounding skin occurs over time in healthy term neonates. Cleaning with alcohol will increase the length of time from birth to cord separation but will not prevent colonization of the umbilical area.

Dans une étude sur échantillon aléatoire et contrôlé, on a comparé l’efficacité de l’alcool à celle de l’eau pour favoriser la séparation du cordon ombilical. Les taux de colonisation bactérienne cutanée entre les groupes ont également été comparés à trois reprises. Le temps de séparation du cordon, les taux de colonisation et les types d’organismes colonisateurs ont aussi été comparés entre les groupes. Sur les 148 participants, 136 (92 %) ont complété le protocole de recherche. Les cordons ombilicaux nettoyés avec de l’eau stérile se sont séparés plus rapidement que ceux nettoyés avec de l’alcool (t = 3,15, p = 0,002). On n’a pas relevé de différences dans les taux de colonisation des différents groupes (F = 1,59, D = 2, p = 0,205). Il n’y a pas eu d’infections ombilicales ou autres. La colonisation bactérienne de la région ombilicale et de la peau adjacente apparaît avec le temps chez les nouveau-nés, nés à terme et en bonne santé. Le nettoyage avec de l’alcool augmente le temps de séparation du cordon et ne prévient pas la colonisation bactérienne de la région ombilicale.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Arad I, Eyal F, Fainmesser P. Umbilical care and cord separation. Arch Dis Child. 1981;56:887–88. doi: 10.1136/adc.56.11.887. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Tötterman LE, Autio S. Treatment of the umbilical cord of the newborn. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 1970;49:57–59. doi: 10.3109/00016347009157515. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Barrett FF, Mason EO, Fleming D. The effect of three cord-care regimens on bacterial colonization of normal newborn infants. J Pediatr. 1979;94(5):796–99. doi: 10.1016/S0022-3476(79)80159-6. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Andrich MP, Golden SM. Umbilical cord care. A study of bacitracin ointment, vs. triple dye. Clin Pediatr. 1984;23(6):342–44. doi: 10.1177/000992288402300609. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Schuman AJ, Oksol BA. The effect of isopropyl alcohol and triple dye on umbilical cord separation time. Military Medicine. 1985;150:49–50. doi: 10.1093/milmed/150.1.49. - DOI - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources