Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 1997 Oct;94(4):319-24.

[Whole-body magnetic resonance angiography using a contrast medium. Technical optimization]

[Article in Italian]
Affiliations
  • PMID: 9465237

[Whole-body magnetic resonance angiography using a contrast medium. Technical optimization]

[Article in Italian]
A Carriero et al. Radiol Med. 1997 Oct.

Abstract

Introduction: We tried to optimize the technique of contrast enhanced MR Angiography (MRA) in the study of the main body arteries.

Materials and methods: Fifty volunteers were examined with contrast enhanced MRA with a superconductive magnet at 1.5 T (Signa GE) and 3D SPGR sequences acquired with the following parameters: TR 8.2 +/- 1.3 ms, TE 1.8 +/- 7 ms, FA 60 degrees, MA 128 X 256; the images were acquired on the sagittal or coronal planes. The contrast agent (Gd-DTPA) was injected with MedRad Spectris system, with the bolus technique and the following standard parameters: velocity 1.5 mL/s and single dose; circulation time was optimized with 2D SPGR for each vessel (pretest). The carotid and pulmonary arteries, the thoracic-abdominal aorta and the iliac arteries were studied. The reader used a multiple choice card to evaluate image quality, signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) and circulation time.

Results: Circulation time was 10.2 s in the carotid arteries, 8.1 s in the pulmonary arteries, 10.3 s in the thoracic aorta, 12.2 s in the abdominal aorta and 13.8 s in the iliac arteries. The signal was 181.8 vs the noise 3.1 in the carotid arteries, 256.8 vs 23.2 in the thoracic aorta, 518.4 vs 23.5 in the pulmonary arteries, 258.8 vs 24.5 in the abdominal aorta and finally 262.7 vs 25.4 in the iliac arteries.

Conclusions: Our experience suggests that contrast enhanced MRA is a good technique to study body arteries.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

Publication types

MeSH terms