Effects of reinforcement rate and delay on the acquisition of lever pressing by rats
- PMID: 9465413
- PMCID: PMC1284647
- DOI: 10.1901/jeab.1998.69-59
Effects of reinforcement rate and delay on the acquisition of lever pressing by rats
Abstract
The acquisition of lever pressing by naive rats, in the absence of shaping, was studied as a function of different rates and unsignaled delays of reinforcement. Groups of 3 rats were each exposed to tandem schedules that differed in either the first or the second component. First-component schedules were either continuous reinforcement or random-interval 15, 30, 60 or 120 s; second-component schedules were fixed-time 0, 1, 3, 6, 12, or 24 s. Rate of responding was low under continuous immediate reinforcement and higher under random-interval 15 s. Random interval 30-s and 60-s schedules produced lower rates that were similar to each other. Random-interval 120 s controlled the lowest rate in the immediate-reinforcement condition. Adding a constant 12-s delay to each of the first-component schedule parameters controlled lower response rates that did not vary systematically with reinforcement rate. The continuous and random-interval 60-s schedules of immediate reinforcement controlled higher global and first-component response rates than did the same schedules combined with longer delays, and first-component rates showed some graded effects of delay duration. In addition, the same schedules controlled higher second-component response rates in combination with a 1-s delay than in combination with longer delays. These results were related to those from previous studies on acquisition with delayed reinforcement as well as to those from similar reinforcement procedures used during steady-state responding.
Similar articles
-
Response acquisition with intermittent immediate and delayed conditioned reinforcement.J Exp Anal Behav. 2013 Mar;99(2):189-98. doi: 10.1002/jeab.14. Epub 2013 Jan 25. J Exp Anal Behav. 2013. PMID: 23355101
-
Response acquisition with delayed reinforcement: a comparison of two-lever procedures.J Exp Anal Behav. 1998 Jan;69(1):17-28. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1998.69-17. J Exp Anal Behav. 1998. PMID: 9465411 Free PMC article.
-
Briefly delayed reinforcement effects on variable-ratio and yoked-interval schedule performance.J Exp Anal Behav. 2013 Sep;100(2):198-210. doi: 10.1002/jeab.41. Epub 2013 Jul 30. J Exp Anal Behav. 2013. PMID: 23900853
-
Response acquisition with signaled delayed reinforcement in a rodent model of ADHD.Behav Brain Res. 2010 Dec 1;213(2):155-60. doi: 10.1016/j.bbr.2010.04.043. Epub 2010 May 7. Behav Brain Res. 2010. PMID: 20438767
-
"The stone which the builders rejected...": Delay of reinforcement and response rate on fixed-interval and related schedules.Behav Processes. 2006 Feb 28;71(2-3):77-87. doi: 10.1016/j.beproc.2005.08.006. Epub 2005 Nov 22. Behav Processes. 2006. PMID: 16307848 Review.
Cited by
-
Response induction during the acquisition and maintenance of lever pressing with delayed reinforcement.J Exp Anal Behav. 2007 Jul;88(1):29-49. doi: 10.1901/jeab.2007.122-04. J Exp Anal Behav. 2007. PMID: 17725050 Free PMC article.
-
Unsignaled delay of reinforcement, relative time, and resistance to change.J Exp Anal Behav. 2005 May;83(3):201-19. doi: 10.1901/jeab.2005.62-04. J Exp Anal Behav. 2005. PMID: 16047606 Free PMC article.
References
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources