Hypertension screening of 1 million Americans. Community Hypertension Evaluation Clinic (CHEC) program, 1973 through 1975
- PMID: 946622
- DOI: 10.1001/jama.235.21.2299
Hypertension screening of 1 million Americans. Community Hypertension Evaluation Clinic (CHEC) program, 1973 through 1975
Abstract
During 1973 through 1975, more than 1 million persons were screened in the nationwide Community Hypertension Evaluation Clinic (CHEC) program at 1,171 sites. While those screened were not from defined populations, findings paralleled those of recent surveys of US population samples. First, CHEC confirmed the scope of the problem of elevated blood pressure in the United States. Of those screened, 247 of 1,000 had a diastolic reading of 90 mm Hg or higher; 116 of 1,000 had a reading of 95 mm Hg or greater. Prevalence of elevated blood pressure rose with age up to age 50 years, was higher in blacks than in whites, and was higher in men than in women. Second, CHEC data confirmed the challenge of undetected, untreated, and uncontrolled hypertension. Previously undetected hypertension was present in 27.7% of hypertensive people, detected but untreated in 10.7%, and treated but uncontrolled in 16.7%--totaling 55.1%.
Similar articles
-
Blood pressure studies in 14 communities. A two-stage screen for hypertension.JAMA. 1977 May 30;237(22):2385-91. doi: 10.1001/jama.1977.03270490025018. JAMA. 1977. PMID: 576938
-
Incorporating socio-economic and risk factor diversity into the development of an African-American community blood pressure control program.Ethn Dis. 1997 Autumn;7(3):175-83. Ethn Dis. 1997. PMID: 9467699
-
Nocturnal blood pressure in treated hypertensive African Americans Compared to treated hypertensive European Americans.J Am Soc Nephrol. 1996 Oct;7(10):2130-4. doi: 10.1681/ASN.V7102130. J Am Soc Nephrol. 1996. PMID: 8915972
-
Noninsulin-dependent diabetes mellitus in black and white Americans.Diabetes Metab Rev. 1990 Mar;6(2):71-90. doi: 10.1002/dmr.5610060202. Diabetes Metab Rev. 1990. PMID: 2198151 Review.
-
Risks for arterial hypertension.Cardiol Clin. 1986 Feb;4(1):57-66. Cardiol Clin. 1986. PMID: 3518934 Review.
Cited by
-
Sex and gender differences in control of blood pressure.Clin Sci (Lond). 2013 Oct;125(7):311-8. doi: 10.1042/CS20130140. Clin Sci (Lond). 2013. PMID: 23746374 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Sex Differences in Insular Cortex Gyri Responses to the Valsalva Maneuver.Front Neurol. 2016 Jun 9;7:87. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2016.00087. eCollection 2016. Front Neurol. 2016. PMID: 27375549 Free PMC article.
-
Screening for mild hypertension: costs and benefits.J Epidemiol Community Health (1978). 1978 Sep;32(3):171-4. doi: 10.1136/jech.32.3.171. J Epidemiol Community Health (1978). 1978. PMID: 101569 Free PMC article.
-
The Edgecombe County High Blood Pressure Control Program: III. Social support, social stressors, and treatment dropout.Am J Public Health. 1985 May;75(5):483-6. doi: 10.2105/ajph.75.5.483. Am J Public Health. 1985. PMID: 3872605 Free PMC article.
-
Impact of a Patient-Centered Behavioral Economics Intervention on Hypertension Control in a Highly Disadvantaged Population: a Randomized Trial.J Gen Intern Med. 2020 Jan;35(1):70-78. doi: 10.1007/s11606-019-05269-z. Epub 2019 Sep 12. J Gen Intern Med. 2020. PMID: 31515735 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources