[Current treatment of candidemia in non-neutropenic patients. Amphotericin B or fluconazole? A retrospective study of 62 consecutive patients]
- PMID: 9477669
[Current treatment of candidemia in non-neutropenic patients. Amphotericin B or fluconazole? A retrospective study of 62 consecutive patients]
Abstract
Background: To analyze the epidemiologic characteristics of non-neutropenic patients with candidemia in a general hospital and the advantages and disadvantages of treatment with amphotericin B or fluconazole.
Patients and methods: A total of 62 adult non-neutropenic patients with candidemia and treated with amphotericin B (n = 35) or fluconazole (n = 27) were studied. All episodes were considered to be associated with infection in a vein catheter. The demographic characteristics, risk factors for the development of candidemia, Candida species recovered from blood culture, underlying diseases, and clinical manifestations in both groups were compared. The evolution regarding secondary effects developed with both drugs, therapy failures, long term complications, and overall mortality rate associated with candidemia were analyzed.
Results: Both groups were comparable with the exception of the percentage of patients infected with species different from Candida albicans, which was higher in the group of patients who received amphotericin B (57%) than in the fluconazole group (26%) (p = 0.02), and in that patients with severe renal failure or AIDS had received preferentially fluconazole. There were no statistically significant differences regarding the evolution of patients treated with amphotericin B or fluconazole with the following factors: therapy failure (27% versus 19%; p = 0.7), overall mortality rate (40% versus 44%; p = 0.6), and mortality directly related to candidemia (33% versus 30%). Mortality was significantly higher among patients who had not their vein catheters removed early (78%) compared with those who had their vein catheters removed early (34%) (p = 0.01). Sixty-six percent of patients treated with amphotericin developed some severe secondary effect, whereas no patient in the fluconazole group developed such effects.
Conclusions: Both amphotericin B and fluconazole seem to be effective drugs for the treatment of vein catheter related candidemia in the non-neutropenic patient, although fluconazole is far less toxic. The early removal of the vein catheter plays a prognostic role with at least the same relevance than the type of antifungal therapy chosen.
Similar articles
-
Therapeutic approaches in patients with candidemia. Evaluation in a multicenter, prospective, observational study.Arch Intern Med. 1995 Dec 11-25;155(22):2429-35. Arch Intern Med. 1995. PMID: 7503601 Clinical Trial.
-
A randomized trial comparing fluconazole with amphotericin B for the treatment of candidemia in patients without neutropenia. Candidemia Study Group and the National Institute.N Engl J Med. 1994 Nov 17;331(20):1325-30. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199411173312001. N Engl J Med. 1994. PMID: 7935701 Clinical Trial.
-
Epidemiology and outcomes of candidemia in 2019 patients: data from the prospective antifungal therapy alliance registry.Clin Infect Dis. 2009 Jun 15;48(12):1695-703. doi: 10.1086/599039. Clin Infect Dis. 2009. PMID: 19441981
-
The fluconazole era: management of hematogenously disseminated candidiasis in the nonneutropenic patient.Pharmacotherapy. 1997 May-Jun;17(3):538-48. Pharmacotherapy. 1997. PMID: 9165556 Review.
-
Epidemiology and treatment of hematogenous candidiasis: a Brazilian perspective.Braz J Infect Dis. 2000 Jun;4(3):113-8. Braz J Infect Dis. 2000. PMID: 10934493 Review.
Cited by
-
[Effect of bladder irrigation with amphotericin B for treatment of urinary tract fungal infection: a meta-analysis].Nan Fang Yi Ke Da Xue Xue Bao. 2018 Apr 20;38(4):466-470. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1673-4254.2018.04.16. Nan Fang Yi Ke Da Xue Xue Bao. 2018. PMID: 29735449 Free PMC article. Chinese.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Medical