The clinical performance of adhesives
- PMID: 9479920
- DOI: 10.1016/s0300-5712(96)00070-x
The clinical performance of adhesives
Abstract
Objectives: Traditional mechanical methods of retaining restorative materials have been replaced to a large extent by tooth conserving adhesive restorative techniques. Because adhesives have been evolving so rapidly for the last few years, the timing is right for evaluating the clinical status of present day adhesives.
Data sources: Current literature with regard to the clinical performance of adhesives has been reviewed. An overview of currently available adhesive systems is provided and a categorization of these adhesives according to their clinical application procedure and their intended mechanism of adhesion is proposed. Parameters of direct relevance to the clinical effectiveness of adhesives are discussed in relation to the clinical effectiveness of today's adhesives.
Conclusions: The clinical performance of present day adhesives has significantly improved, allowing adhesive restorations to be placed with a high predictable level of clinical success. Most modern adhesive systems are superior to their predecessors, especially in terms of retention that is no longer the main cause of premature clinical failure. Recent adhesives also appear less sensitive to substrate and other clinical co-variables. As the remaining major shortcoming of modern adhesives, none of these modern systems however appears yet to be able to guarantee hermetically sealed restorations with margins free of discoloration for a long time.
Similar articles
-
The science of bonding: from first to sixth generation.J Am Dent Assoc. 2000 Jun;131 Suppl:20S-25S. doi: 10.14219/jada.archive.2000.0398. J Am Dent Assoc. 2000. PMID: 10860341 Review.
-
Adhesive procedures in daily practice: essential aspects.Compend Contin Educ Dent. 2008 May;29(4):208-15; quiz 216, 218. Compend Contin Educ Dent. 2008. PMID: 18524205
-
New concepts in dental adhesion.Northwest Dent. 2000 Jul-Aug;79(4):29-33. Northwest Dent. 2000. PMID: 11413622 Review. No abstract available.
-
3-year clinical effectiveness of one-step adhesives in non-carious cervical lesions.J Dent. 2013 Aug;41(8):675-82. doi: 10.1016/j.jdent.2013.05.016. Epub 2013 Jun 6. J Dent. 2013. PMID: 23747824 Clinical Trial.
-
Seventh-generation adhesive systems.Dent Today. 2002 Nov;21(11):106-11. Dent Today. 2002. PMID: 12483935 No abstract available.
Cited by
-
Marginal sealing durability of two contemporary self-etch adhesives.ISRN Dent. 2012;2012:204813. doi: 10.5402/2012/204813. Epub 2012 Apr 29. ISRN Dent. 2012. PMID: 22611501 Free PMC article.
-
Magnitude and distribution of stresses in composite resin and sound dentine interface with mechanical retentions.J Clin Exp Dent. 2015 Apr 1;7(2):e232-6. doi: 10.4317/jced.52144. eCollection 2015 Apr. J Clin Exp Dent. 2015. PMID: 26155338 Free PMC article.
-
A new concept in hybridization: Bromelain enzyme for deproteinizing dentin before application of adhesive system.Contemp Clin Dent. 2013 Oct;4(4):421-6. doi: 10.4103/0976-237X.123015. Contemp Clin Dent. 2013. PMID: 24403782 Free PMC article.
-
Two-year clinical performance of two one-step self-etching adhesives in the restoration of cervical lesions.Clin Oral Investig. 2008 Sep;12(3):225-32. doi: 10.1007/s00784-008-0193-9. Epub 2008 Mar 28. Clin Oral Investig. 2008. PMID: 18369669 Clinical Trial.
-
In Vitro Investigation of the Effects of Various Reducing Agents on Dentin Treated with Hydrogen Peroxide.Polymers (Basel). 2024 May 23;16(11):1473. doi: 10.3390/polym16111473. Polymers (Basel). 2024. PMID: 38891420 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Research Materials