Randomised trial of high-dose isosorbide dinitrate plus low-dose furosemide versus high-dose furosemide plus low-dose isosorbide dinitrate in severe pulmonary oedema
- PMID: 9482291
- DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(97)08417-1
Randomised trial of high-dose isosorbide dinitrate plus low-dose furosemide versus high-dose furosemide plus low-dose isosorbide dinitrate in severe pulmonary oedema
Abstract
Background: Nitrates and furosemide, commonly administered in the treatment of pulmonary oedema, have not been compared in a prospective clinical trial. We compared the efficacy and safety of these drugs in a randomised trial of patients with severe pulmonary oedema and oxygen saturation below 90%.
Methods: Patients presenting to mobile emergency units with signs of congestive heart failure were treated with oxygen 10 L/min, intravenous furosemide 40 mg, and morphine 3 mg bolus. 110 patients were randomly assigned either to group A, who received isosorbide dinitrate (3 mg bolus administered intravenously every 5 min; n=56) or to group B, who received furosemide (80 mg bolus administered intravenously every 15 min, as well as isosorbide dinitrate 1 mg/h, increased every 10 min by 1 mg/h; n=54). Six patients were withdrawn on the basis of chest radiography results. Treatment was continued until oxygen saturation was above 96% or mean arterial blood pressure had decreased by 30% or to below 90 mm Hg. The main endpoints were death, need for mechanical ventilation, and myocardial infarction. The analyses were by intention to treat.
Findings: Mechanical ventilation was required in seven (13%) of 52 group-A patients and 21 (40%) of 52 group-B patients (p=0.0041). Myocardial infarction occurred in nine (17%) and 19 (37%) patients, respectively (p=0.047). One patient in group A and three in group B died (p=0.61). One or more of these endpoints occurred in 13 (25%) and 24 (46%) patients, respectively (p=0.041).
Interpretation: High-dose isosorbide dinitrate, given as repeated intravenous boluses after low-dose intravenous furosemide, is safe and effective in controlling severe pulmonary oedema. This treatment regimen is more effective than high-dose furosemide with low-dose isosorbide nitrate in terms of need for mechanical ventilation and frequency of myocardial infarction.
Comment in
-
Treatment of acute pulmonary oedema: diuresis or vasodilatation?Lancet. 1998 Feb 7;351(9100):382-3. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(98)22006-X. Lancet. 1998. PMID: 9482284 No abstract available.
-
Nitrates for myocardial infarction.Lancet. 1998 Jun 6;351(9117):1731-2; author reply 1732-3. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(05)77764-3. Lancet. 1998. PMID: 9734909 No abstract available.
-
Nitrates for myocardial infarction.Lancet. 1998 Jun 6;351(9117):1732-3. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(05)77765-5. Lancet. 1998. PMID: 9734910 No abstract available.
-
Support ventilation versus conventional oxygen.Lancet. 2001 Apr 7;357(9262):1125-6. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(00)04271-9. Lancet. 2001. PMID: 11312550 No abstract available.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
