Pathologic classification of prostate carcinoma: the impact of margin status
- PMID: 9486580
- DOI: 10.1002/(sici)1097-0142(19980301)82:5<902::aid-cncr15>3.0.co;2-4
Pathologic classification of prostate carcinoma: the impact of margin status
Abstract
Background: A proposed pathologic (pTNM) classification system for prostate carcinoma was analyzed for its impact on survival outcome in the prostate specific antigen (PSA) era. The impact of margin status on the survival outcome of patients with otherwise organ-confined disease (i.e., without extraprostatic extension or seminal vesicle involvement) was assessed.
Methods: Among 5467 patients, the original pathologic classification was T2 in 2094 patients; those with evidence of positive margins, extraprostatic extension, or seminal vesicle involvement were initially classified as having pT3 disease (2920 patients) or pT4 residual disease (211 patients). According to the proposed pTNM system, 1512 patients for whom margin status was considered independent of T classification were reclassified.
Results: After reclassification, 803 specimens had been down-classified to pT2, resulting in 2932 (54%) with pT2N0 organ-confined disease and a margin positivity rate of 27%; originally, only 38% of patients had been classified as pT2N0. When the old and new classifications were compared, 5-year progression free survival to the combined endpoint of clinical and/or PSA progression (< or = 0.2 ng/mL) was 86% versus 84% and 70% versus 67% for disease classified as pT2N0 and pT3N0, respectively. Multivariate analysis assessed the effect of margin status on 2334 pT2N0 patients (classified according to the proposed pTNM system) who did not receive adjuvant therapy; adjustments were made for Gleason grade, preoperative PSA, and DNA ploidy. In this analysis, the relative risk (with 95% confidence interval) associated with positive margins was 1.65 (1.24-2.18); this was significant for the combined endpoint of clinical/PSA progression. The 5-year survival, free of clinical/PSA progression, was 86% for those without versus 75% for those with positive margins.
Conclusions: This analysis supports the adoption of the proposed pTNM system, which will allow for uniform reporting of pathologic data on prostate carcinoma. For patients with organ-confined disease, positive margins are associated with higher rates of PSA progression. Accordingly, patients should be stratified based on margin positivity in addition to pT classification.
Similar articles
-
Anatomic site-specific positive margins in organ-confined prostate cancer and its impact on outcome after radical prostatectomy.Urology. 1997 Nov;50(5):733-9. doi: 10.1016/S0090-4295(97)00450-0. Urology. 1997. PMID: 9372884
-
Correlation of margin status and extraprostatic extension with progression of prostate carcinoma.Cancer. 1999 Nov 1;86(9):1775-82. doi: 10.1002/(sici)1097-0142(19991101)86:9<1775::aid-cncr20>3.0.co;2-l. Cancer. 1999. PMID: 10547551
-
Prognostic significance of positive surgical margins in patients with extraprostatic carcinoma after radical prostatectomy.Cancer. 2002 Sep 15;95(6):1215-9. doi: 10.1002/cncr.10871. Cancer. 2002. PMID: 12216087
-
Use of Gleason score, prostate specific antigen, seminal vesicle and margin status to predict biochemical failure after radical prostatectomy.J Urol. 2001 Jan;165(1):119-25. doi: 10.1097/00005392-200101000-00030. J Urol. 2001. PMID: 11125379
-
Impact of positive surgical margins on prostate-specific antigen failure after radical prostatectomy in adjuvant treatment-naïve patients.BJU Int. 2011 Jun;107(11):1748-54. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2010.09728.x. Epub 2010 Sep 30. BJU Int. 2011. PMID: 20883488
Cited by
-
The role of endorectal coil MRI in preoperative staging and decision-making for the treatment of clinically localized prostate cancer.MAGMA. 2008 Nov;21(6):371-7. doi: 10.1007/s10334-008-0116-4. Epub 2008 Aug 27. MAGMA. 2008. PMID: 18751745 Review.
-
De novo expression of CD44 in prostate carcinoma is correlated with systemic dissemination of prostate cancer.J Clin Pathol. 1998 Nov;51(11):798-802. doi: 10.1136/jcp.51.11.798. J Clin Pathol. 1998. PMID: 10193318 Free PMC article.
-
Prostate cancer management: (1) an update on localised disease.Postgrad Med J. 2003 Oct;79(936):575-80. doi: 10.1136/pmj.79.936.575. Postgrad Med J. 2003. PMID: 14612600 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Important preoperative prognostic factors for extracapsular extension, seminal vesicle invasion and lymph node involvement in cases with radical retropubic prostatectomy.Int Urol Nephrol. 2004;36(3):369-73. doi: 10.1007/s11255-004-0746-z. Int Urol Nephrol. 2004. PMID: 15783108
-
Impact of positive surgical margins on biochemical relapse after radical retropubic prostatectomy (RRP).Cent European J Urol. 2011;64(4):223-8. doi: 10.5173/ceju.2011.04.art7. Epub 2011 Dec 9. Cent European J Urol. 2011. PMID: 24578898 Free PMC article.
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Medical
Research Materials
Miscellaneous