Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 1997;58(4):171-6.

[Long-term socioeconomic outcome of lumbar disc microsurgery]

[Article in German]
Affiliations
  • PMID: 9487653

[Long-term socioeconomic outcome of lumbar disc microsurgery]

[Article in German]
W Deinsberger et al. Zentralbl Neurochir. 1997.

Abstract

Lumbar disc surgery is frequently performed but only few long-term outcome studies have been published. To assess the socioeconomic long-term outcome after lumbar disc surgery this study was performed using the Functional Economic Rating scale developed by Prolo et al. in 1986. The study group, mailed a questionnaire, consisted of 663 patients (18 to 60 years) operated on in 1983 or 1984. 23 patients (3.5%) died in the follow-up period. 406 (66% male and 34% female) patients answered the questionnaires (61%), therefore being eligible for further investigation. Mean age at the time of operation was 43 +/- 9.5 years. Preoperatively 29% of patients did sedentary work, 46% were employed in less strenuous and 25% in strenuous occupations. A motor deficit was present in 59% of patients preoperatively. In 51% the L4/5 level and in 38% the L5/S1 level was operated; 5% were operated in more than one level. In 45% an intraspinal sequester was found intraoperatively. Intra- and postoperative complications occurred in 14 patients (complication rate 3.4%). Six weeks after surgery all patients were examined in our outpatient department. 93% were more or less relieved of their complaints. 10 years after lumbar disc surgery a good outcome defined as Prolo scale 8-10 was achieved in 38%, a moderate outcome (Prolo scale 6-7) in 40% and a poor outcome (Prolo scale < 5) in 22%, respectively. Patients with strenuous occupations had a significantly (p < 0.001) less favorable outcome than patients with less strenuous or sedentary occupations. 32% were able to work in the previous profession with no restrictions. 42% were able to work part time at the previous occupation or with limited status and 9% had to change their profession. 17% were not able to gain any occupation postoperatively and retired. Vocational consequences depended on the preoperative type of occupation. 54% of patients with strenuous occupations had to change the profession or to retire compared to 15% of patients with sedentary occupations. During the 10-year follow-up period, 125 patients (31%) underwent at least another lumbar disc operation 4.8 +/- 3.8 years after their first surgery. Recurrence at the same level and the same side occurred in 14%. Reoperated patients had a significantly (p < 0.001) less favorable outcome than patients not operated on again. The results of this study indicate the recommendation of a prolonged postoperative course of treatment, especially in patients with strenuous occupations.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources