Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 1997 Dec;75(6):523-7.
doi: 10.1038/icb.1997.83.

Dependence of the adaptive immune response on innate immunity: some questions answered but new paradoxes emerge

Affiliations

Dependence of the adaptive immune response on innate immunity: some questions answered but new paradoxes emerge

C R Parish et al. Immunol Cell Biol. 1997 Dec.

Abstract

Recently a new model of vertebrate immunity has been gaining popularity. In this new model it is hypothesized that activation of innate immunity is a prerequisite for an adaptive immune response to an antigen. Following activation the innate system induces key costimulator molecules on APC, which are essential for antigen-driven clonal expansion of T and B cells. The model largely explains the need for adjuvants in the induction of adaptive immunity, provides a possible mechanism for the immune system to perceive the biological nature of a pathogen and thereby produce the most effective immune response, and transfers much of the onus of self-non-self discrimination from the adaptive to the innate immune system. In the present article we highlight two paradoxes raised by the new model. First, by linking adaptive immunity to innate recognition the immune system is unable to take full advantage of the genetic diversity of T and B cell antigen receptors. Thus, the ability of the immune system to combat a pathogen is totally dependent on the efficiency of recognition by the innate system and, therefore, the germ-line mutation rate of the genes involved in the innate response. Second, if signals from the innate system induce costimulatory molecules on APC, then one would expect the accidental clonal expansion of many autoreactive T and B cells. We suggest that one means of resolving the first paradox is to propose that the major reason for the evolution of adaptive immunity was to provide, via immunological memory, resistance to reinfection, rather than simply to combat the primary infection by the pathogen. In the case of autoreactivity we suggest that autodestruction is prevented by immune responses being tightly regulated at the effector T cell level. Finally, we argue that the two paradoxes, rather than undermining the new model of immunity, highlight our lack of understanding of key elements of the vertebrate immune system.

PubMed Disclaimer

LinkOut - more resources