A comparison of omeprazole with ranitidine for ulcers associated with nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drugs. Acid Suppression Trial: Ranitidine versus Omeprazole for NSAID-associated Ulcer Treatment (ASTRONAUT) Study Group
- PMID: 9494148
- DOI: 10.1056/NEJM199803123381104
A comparison of omeprazole with ranitidine for ulcers associated with nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drugs. Acid Suppression Trial: Ranitidine versus Omeprazole for NSAID-associated Ulcer Treatment (ASTRONAUT) Study Group
Abstract
Background: Suppressing acid secretion is thought o reduce the risk of ulcers associated with regular use of nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), but the best means of accomplishing this is uncertain.
Methods: We studied 541 patients who required continuous treatment with NSAIDs and who had ulcers or more than 10 erosions in either the stomach or duodenum. Patients were randomly assigned to double-blind treatment with omeprazole, 20 mg or 40 mg orally per day, or ranitidine, 150 mg orally twice a day, for four or eight weeks, depending on when treatment was successful (defined as the resolution of ulcer and the presence of fewer than five erosions in the stomach, and fewer than five erosions in the duodenum, and not more than mild dyspepsia). We randomly assigned 432 patients in whom treatment was successful to maintenance treatment with either 20 mg of omeprazole per day or 150 mg of ranitidine twice a day for six months.
Results: At eight weeks, treatment was successful in 80 percent (140 of 174) of the patients in the group given 20 mg of omeprazole per day, 79 percent (148 of 187) of those given 40 mg of omeprazole per day, and 63 percent (110 of 174) of those given ranitidine (P<0.001 for the comparison with 20 mg of omeprazole and P=0.001 for the comparison with 40 mg of omeprazole). The rates of healing of all types of lesions were higher with omeprazole than with ranitidine. During maintenance therapy, the estimated proportion of patients in remission at the end of six months was 72 percent in the omeprazole group and 59 percent in the ranitidine group. The rates of adverse events were similar between groups during both phases. Both medications were well tolerated.
Conclusions: In patients with regular use of NSAIDs, omeprazole healed and prevented ulcers more effectively than did ranitidine.
Comment in
- ACP J Club. 1998 Jul-Aug;129(1):9
-
Therapies for ulcers associated with nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drugs.N Engl J Med. 1998 Jul 30;339(5):349; author reply 350-1. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199807303390516. N Engl J Med. 1998. PMID: 9696649 No abstract available.
-
Therapies for ulcers associated with nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drugs.N Engl J Med. 1998 Jul 30;339(5):349-50; author reply 350-1. N Engl J Med. 1998. PMID: 9696650 No abstract available.
-
Therapies for ulcers associated with nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drugs.N Engl J Med. 1998 Jul 30;339(5):350-1. N Engl J Med. 1998. PMID: 9696652 No abstract available.
Similar articles
-
Omeprazole compared with misoprostol for ulcers associated with nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drugs. Omeprazole versus Misoprostol for NSAID-induced Ulcer Management (OMNIUM) Study Group.N Engl J Med. 1998 Mar 12;338(11):727-34. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199803123381105. N Engl J Med. 1998. PMID: 9494149 Clinical Trial.
-
Famotidine for the prevention of gastric and duodenal ulcers caused by nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drugs.N Engl J Med. 1996 May 30;334(22):1435-9. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199605303342204. N Engl J Med. 1996. PMID: 8618582 Clinical Trial.
-
Effect of omeprazole and ranitidine on ulcer healing and relapse rates in patients with benign gastric ulcer.N Engl J Med. 1989 Jan 12;320(2):69-75. doi: 10.1056/NEJM198901123200201. N Engl J Med. 1989. PMID: 2643037 Clinical Trial.
-
Non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug gastropathy: clinical results with H2 antagonists and proton pump inhibitors.Ital J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 1999;31 Suppl 1:S73-8. Ital J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 1999. PMID: 10379473 Review.
-
A clinical approach to management of patients with non-steroidal anti-inflammatory gastropathy.Ital J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 1999;31 Suppl 1:S89-92. Ital J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 1999. PMID: 10379475 Review.
Cited by
-
Non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs: overall risks and management. Complementary roles for COX-2 inhibitors and proton pump inhibitors.Gut. 2003 Apr;52(4):600-8. doi: 10.1136/gut.52.4.600. Gut. 2003. PMID: 12631678 Free PMC article. Review.
-
COX-2 inhibitors in rheumatoid arthritis.Curr Rheumatol Rep. 2001 Feb;3(1):86-91. doi: 10.1007/s11926-001-0055-9. Curr Rheumatol Rep. 2001. PMID: 11177775 Review.
-
[Economic evaluation of a new selective COX-2 NSAID, rofecoxib, in a real practice context].Aten Primaria. 2002 Oct 31;30(7):442-8. doi: 10.1016/s0212-6567(02)79069-0. Aten Primaria. 2002. PMID: 12406411 Free PMC article. Spanish.
-
[Are COX-2 inhibitors indicated for patients at risk?].Aten Primaria. 2002 Mar 15;29(4):230-2. doi: 10.1016/s0212-6567(02)70549-0. Aten Primaria. 2002. PMID: 11893299 Free PMC article. Review. Spanish. No abstract available.
-
Primary prevention of adverse gastroduodenal effects from short-term use of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs by omeprazole 20 mg in healthy subjects: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study.Dig Dis Sci. 2008 Aug;53(8):2059-65. doi: 10.1007/s10620-007-0127-4. Epub 2008 Jan 26. Dig Dis Sci. 2008. PMID: 18224442 Clinical Trial.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical