Impaired fecundity in the United States: 1982-1995
- PMID: 9494814
Impaired fecundity in the United States: 1982-1995
Abstract
Context: The 1995 National Survey of Family Growth (NSFG) provides new nationally representative data to test the accuracy of the commonly held assumption that impaired fecundity has been rising in the United States over the past decade.
Methods: Using data from the 1982, 1988 and 1995 rounds of the NSFG, trends in both the proportions and numbers of women with impaired fecundity and of those who received infertility services were examined. Multiple logistic regressions were carried out to estimate the effects of demographic characteristics on the likelihood of currently having impaired fecundity and of ever having received medical help for infertility.
Results: The proportion of U.S. women aged 15-44 who reported some form of fecundity impairment rose from 8% in 1982 and 1988 to 10% in 1995, an increase in absolute numbers from 4.6 million to 6.2 million women. Although the proportion of fecundity-impaired women who had ever sought medical help did not change between 1988 and 1995 (44%), the absolute numbers of such women grew by nearly 30%, from 2.1 million to 2.7 million. Women who had ever sought help for fertility problems were older and had a higher income than those who had not, and were more likely to be married.
Conclusion: The dramatic increase in the numbers of U.S. women with impaired fecundity occurred because the large baby-boom cohort, many of whom delayed childbearing, had reached their later and less fecund reproductive years. This increase in both rates and numbers occurred across almost all age, parity, marital status, education, income, and race and ethnicity subgroups.
Comment in
-
Reasons for infecundity.Fam Plann Perspect. 1999 May-Jun;31(3):156-7. Fam Plann Perspect. 1999. PMID: 10379434 No abstract available.
Similar articles
-
Use of infertility services in the United States: 1995.Fam Plann Perspect. 2000 May-Jun;32(3):132-7. Fam Plann Perspect. 2000. PMID: 10894259
-
Adoption, adoption seeking, and relinquishment for adoption in the United States.Adv Data. 1999 May 11;(306):1-16. Adv Data. 1999. PMID: 10662357
-
Health disparities and infertility: impacts of state-level insurance mandates.Fertil Steril. 2006 Apr;85(4):858-65. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2005.11.038. Fertil Steril. 2006. PMID: 16580365
-
Infertility and assisted reproduction in Denmark. Epidemiology and psychosocial consequences.Dan Med Bull. 2006 Nov;53(4):390-417. Dan Med Bull. 2006. PMID: 17150146 Review.
-
Epidemiology of infertility.Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol. 1990 Apr;2(2):154-8. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol. 1990. PMID: 2102314 Review. No abstract available.
Cited by
-
Effects of infertility insurance mandates on fertility.J Health Econ. 2007 May 1;26(3):431-46. doi: 10.1016/j.jhealeco.2006.10.012. Epub 2006 Nov 28. J Health Econ. 2007. PMID: 17129624 Free PMC article.
-
Widespread epigenetic abnormalities suggest a broad DNA methylation erasure defect in abnormal human sperm.PLoS One. 2007 Dec 12;2(12):e1289. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0001289. PLoS One. 2007. PMID: 18074014 Free PMC article.
-
The enhancing effects of alcoholic extract of Nigella sativa seed on fertility potential, plasma gonadotropins and testosterone in male rats.Iran J Reprod Med. 2012 Jul;10(4):355-62. Iran J Reprod Med. 2012. PMID: 25246898 Free PMC article.
-
Invasive prenatal testing decisions in pregnancy after infertility.Prenat Diagn. 2010 Jun;30(6):575-81. doi: 10.1002/pd.2529. Prenat Diagn. 2010. PMID: 20509160 Free PMC article.
-
An occupational reproductive research agenda for the third millennium.Environ Health Perspect. 2003 Apr;111(4):584-92. doi: 10.1289/ehp.5548. Environ Health Perspect. 2003. PMID: 12676620 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Miscellaneous