The meiotic checkpoint monitoring synapsis eliminates spermatocytes via p53-independent apoptosis
- PMID: 9500548
- DOI: 10.1038/ng0398-257
The meiotic checkpoint monitoring synapsis eliminates spermatocytes via p53-independent apoptosis
Abstract
Evidence is accumulating that meiosis is subject to 'checkpoints' that monitor the quality of this complex process. In yeast, unresolved double strand breaks (DSBs) in DNA are thought to trigger a 'recombination checkpoint' that leads to pachytene arrest. In higher eukaryotes, there is evidence for a checkpoint that monitors chromosome synapsis and in mammals the most compelling evidence relates to the sex chromosomes. In normal male mice, there is synapsis between the X and Y pseudoautosomal regions; in XSxr(a)O mice, with a single asynaptic sex chromosome, there is arrest at the first meiotic metaphase, the arrested cells being eliminated by apoptosis (our unpublished data). Satisfying the requirement for pseudoautosomal synapsis by providing a pairing partner for the XSxr(a) chromosome avoids this arrest. We have considered that this 'synapsis checkpoint' may be a modification of the yeast 'recombination checkpoint' with unresolved DSBs (a corollary of asynapsis) providing the trigger for apoptosis. DSBs induced by irradiation are known to trigger apoptosis in a number of cell types via a p53-dependent pathway, and we now show that irradiation-induced spermatogonial apoptosis is also p53-dependent. In contrast, the apoptotic elimination of spermatocytes with synaptic errors proved to be p53-independent.
Comment in
-
Every sperm is sacred--or is it?Nat Genet. 1998 Mar;18(3):202-4. doi: 10.1038/ng0398-202. Nat Genet. 1998. PMID: 9500533 No abstract available.
Similar articles
-
Disruption of pairing and synapsis of chromosomes causes stage-specific apoptosis of male meiotic cells.Theriogenology. 2008 Feb;69(3):333-9. doi: 10.1016/j.theriogenology.2007.09.029. Epub 2007 Nov 7. Theriogenology. 2008. PMID: 17997150
-
Meiosis and apoptosis in germ cells of X-autosome translocation carrier boars.Mol Reprod Dev. 2000 Aug;56(4):448-57. doi: 10.1002/1098-2795(200008)56:4<448::AID-MRD2>3.0.CO;2-P. Mol Reprod Dev. 2000. PMID: 10911394
-
Spermatocyte responses in vitro to induced DNA damage.Mol Reprod Dev. 2006 Aug;73(8):1061-72. doi: 10.1002/mrd.20508. Mol Reprod Dev. 2006. PMID: 16700071
-
Synaptonemal complex analysis in human male infertility.Eur J Histochem. 1999;43(4):265-76. Eur J Histochem. 1999. PMID: 10682264 Review.
-
In vitro spermatogenesis: Why meiotic checkpoints matter.Curr Top Dev Biol. 2023;151:345-369. doi: 10.1016/bs.ctdb.2022.04.009. Epub 2022 Jun 9. Curr Top Dev Biol. 2023. PMID: 36681476 Review.
Cited by
-
Phospho-Regulation of Meiotic Prophase.Front Cell Dev Biol. 2021 Apr 13;9:667073. doi: 10.3389/fcell.2021.667073. eCollection 2021. Front Cell Dev Biol. 2021. PMID: 33928091 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Physiological Roles of DNA Double-Strand Breaks.J Nucleic Acids. 2017;2017:6439169. doi: 10.1155/2017/6439169. Epub 2017 Oct 18. J Nucleic Acids. 2017. PMID: 29181194 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Telomere dysfunction triggers developmentally regulated germ cell apoptosis.Mol Biol Cell. 2001 Jul;12(7):2023-30. doi: 10.1091/mbc.12.7.2023. Mol Biol Cell. 2001. PMID: 11452000 Free PMC article.
-
Does the Pachytene Checkpoint, a Feature of Meiosis, Filter Out Mistakes in Double-Strand DNA Break Repair and as a side-Effect Strongly Promote Adaptive Speciation?Integr Org Biol. 2022 Apr 8;4(1):obac008. doi: 10.1093/iob/obac008. eCollection 2022. Integr Org Biol. 2022. PMID: 36827645 Free PMC article.
-
Control of the meiotic cell division program in plants.Plant Reprod. 2013 Sep;26(3):143-58. doi: 10.1007/s00497-013-0223-x. Epub 2013 Jul 14. Plant Reprod. 2013. PMID: 23852379 Free PMC article. Review.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Molecular Biology Databases
Research Materials
Miscellaneous