Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 1998 Feb;13(2):111-6.
doi: 10.1046/j.1525-1497.1998.00027.x.

Giving feedback in medical education: verification of recommended techniques

Affiliations

Giving feedback in medical education: verification of recommended techniques

M G Hewson et al. J Gen Intern Med. 1998 Feb.

Abstract

Objective: We investigated naturally occurring feedback incidents to substantiate literature-based recommended techniques for giving feedback effectively.

Setting: A faculty development course for improving the teaching of the medical interview, with opportunities for participants to receive feedback.

Participants: Seventy-four course participants (clinician-educators from a wide range of medical disciplines, and several behavioral scientists).

Measurements and main results: We used qualitative and quantitative approaches. Participants provided narratives of helpful and unhelpful incidents experienced during the course and then rated their own narratives using a semantic-differential survey. We found strong agreement between the two approaches, and congruence between our data and the recommended literature. Giving feedback effectively includes: establishing an appropriate interpersonal climate; using an appropriate location; establishing mutually agreed upon goals; eliciting the learner's thoughts and feelings; reflecting on observed behaviors; being nonjudgmental; relating feedback to specific behaviors; offering the right amount of feedback; and offering suggestions for improvement.

Conclusions: Feedback techniques experienced by respondents substantiate the literature-based recommendations, and corrective feedback is regarded as helpful when delivered appropriately. A model for providing feedback is offered.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Profile of behaviors associated with helpful and unhelpful feedback incidents (mean scores and confidence intervals).

Comment in

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Ende J. Feedback in clinical medical education. JAMA. 1983;250(8):777–81. - PubMed
    1. Isaacson JH, Posk LK, Litaker DG, Halperin AK. Resident perceptions of the evaluation process. Society of General Internal Medicine. J Gen Intern Med. 1995;10(suppl):89.
    1. Westberg J, Jason H. Collaborative Clinical Education: The Foundation of Effective Health Care. New York, NY: Springer Company; 1993.
    1. Scholtes PR. The Team Handbook: How to Use Teams to Improve Quality. Madison, Wis: Joiner Associates; 1988.
    1. Lipkin M, Kaplan C, Clark W, Novack DH. Teaching medical interviewing: the Lipkin model. In: Lipkin M, Putnam SM, Lazare A, editors. The Medical Interview: Clinical Care, Education and Research. New York, NY: Springer-Verlag; 1995. pp. 413–22. In ed.