Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Clinical Trial
. 1998 Jan;79(1):86-92.
doi: 10.1136/hrt.79.1.86.

Beta blockers in heart failure: a comparison of a vasodilating beta blocker with metoprolol

Affiliations
Clinical Trial

Beta blockers in heart failure: a comparison of a vasodilating beta blocker with metoprolol

J E Sanderson et al. Heart. 1998 Jan.

Abstract

Objective: To determine whether a third generation vasodilating beta blocker (celiprolol) has long term clinical advantages over metoprolol in patients with chronic heart failure.

Design: A double blind placebo controlled randomised trial.

Setting: University teaching Hospital.

Patients: 50 patients with stable chronic heart failure (NYHA class II-IV) due to idiopathic dilated, ischaemic, or hypertensive cardiomyopathy, with left ventricular ejection fraction < 0.45.

Interventions: Celiprolol 200 mg daily (n = 21), metoprolol 50 mg twice daily (n = 19), or placebo (n = 10) for three months with a four week dose titration period. After the double blind period, patients entered an open label study (with placebo group receiving beta blockers) and were assessed after one year.

Main outcome measures: Clinical response, efficacy, and tolerance were assessed by the Minnesota heart failure symptom questionnaire six minute walk test, Doppler echocardiography (systolic and diastolic function), radionuclide ventriculography, and atrial and brain natriuretic peptides measured at baseline and after three months.

Results: In the metoprolol group at 12 weeks v baseline there was a 47% reduction in symptom score (p < 0.001), improvement of NYHA class (mean (SEM), 2.6 (0.12) to 1.9 (0.13), p = 0.001), exercise distance (1246 (54) to 1402 (52) feet, p < 0.001), and left ventricular ejection fraction (26.9(3.1)% to 31(3.0)%, p = 0.016), and a fall in heart rate (resting, 79 (3) to 62 (3) beats/min, p < 0.001). In the celiprolol group there was a 38% reduction in symptom score (p = 0.02), less improvement in exercise distance (1191 (55) to 1256 (61) feet, p = 0.05), and no significant changes in NYHA class, left ventricular ejection fraction, or heart rate. Mortality at one year was 11% in metoprolol and 19% in the celiprolol group, and symptomatic improvement was maintained in the survivors.

Conclusions: Both drugs were well tolerated but the vasodilator properties of celiprolol do not seem to provide any obvious additional benefit in the long term treatment of heart failure.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Reduction in symptom score after 12 weeks of placebo (P), metoprolol (M), or celiprolol (C) treatment. *p = 0.073 v placebo.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Changes in left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) after 12 weeks of placebo (P), metoprolol (M), or celiprolol (C) treatment. *p = 0.0049, †p = 0.028 v placebo.
Figure 3
Figure 3
24 hour heart rate (Holter) analysis at baseline and after 12 weeks of treatment with placebo (P), metoprolol (M), or celiprolol (C).

References

    1. Circulation. 1996 Aug 15;94(4):673-82 - PubMed
    1. Circulation. 1996 Aug 1;94(3):340-5 - PubMed
    1. Circulation. 1996 Nov 1;94(9):2285-96 - PubMed
    1. Eur Heart J. 1996 Nov;17(11):1694-702 - PubMed
    1. N Engl J Med. 1966 May 19;274(20):1102-8 - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources