Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 1998 Feb;21(2):401-9.
doi: 10.1111/j.1540-8159.1998.tb00064.x.

High energy radiofrequency catheter ablation for common atrial flutter targeting the isthmus between the inferior vena cava and tricuspid valve annulus using a super long tip electrode

Affiliations
Comparative Study

High energy radiofrequency catheter ablation for common atrial flutter targeting the isthmus between the inferior vena cava and tricuspid valve annulus using a super long tip electrode

Y Iesaka et al. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 1998 Feb.

Abstract

There have been controversies concerning the optimal target sites and approaches in radiofrequency catheter ablation of common atrial flutter. We attempted high energy radiofrequency catheter ablation targeting the isthmus between the inferior vena cava and tricuspid valve annulus (IVC-TV isthmus) with a super long (8 mm) tip electrode, and compared the efficacy of this anatomical approach with the electrophysiological approach targeting the posteroseptal right atrium posterior to the coronary sinus using a standard 4-mm tip electrode. Atrial flutter was successfully ablated in 12 of 12 patients (100%) without recurrence with the anatomical approach, while, in 7 of 9 patients (64%) with 2 recurrences with the electrophysiological approach. In comparison of ablation data between the anatomical and electrophysiological approaches, there were significant differences in the mean number of application pulses (anatomical vs electrophysiological: 2.3 +/- 0.8 vs 9.9 +/- 6.4, P < 0.01), applied wattage (39 +/- 12 W vs 24 +/- 6 W, P < 0.01), applied energy per application (1,986 +/- 426 J vs 659 +/- 323 J, P < 0.01), fluoroscopic time (26 +/- 11 min vs 74 +/- 30 minutes, P < 0.01), and procedure time (59 +/- 8 min vs 181 +/- 53 min, P < 0.01). In conclusion, the anatomical approach is superior to the electrophysiological one with respect to procedure and radiation time, and linear ablation at the IVC-TV isthmus with an 8-mm tip electrode and high energy application is highly effective and safe.

PubMed Disclaimer

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources