Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 1998 Mar;88(3):475-7.
doi: 10.2105/ajph.88.3.475.

Quality of reviews in epidemiology

R A Breslow  1 , S A Ross, D L Weed
Affiliations

Quality of reviews in epidemiology

R A Breslow et al. Am J Public Health. 1998 Mar.

Abstract

Objectives: This study examined the quality of recent reviews in epidemiology.

Methods: All 1995 issues of 7 widely read epidemiology journals were searched to identify reviews.

Results: Twenty-nine reviews were identified. Methodology was not specified or incomplete for literature searches in 79% of reviews; the same was true for inclusion criteria in 83% and for combining studies in 62%. More than 60% of the reviews were not methodologically systematic.

Conclusions: There is a need to improve the quality of review papers in epidemiology. If systematic methodology were followed more frequently, epidemiologic science and its application could be improved.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

See all similar articles

Cited by

See all "Cited by" articles

References

    1. J Epidemiol Community Health. 1995 Aug;49(4):335-43 - PubMed
    1. Int J Epidemiol. 1995 Apr;24(2):255-65 - PubMed
    1. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 1995 Jul-Aug;4(5):567-71 - PubMed
    1. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 1995 Sep;4(6):681-7 - PubMed
    1. J Clin Epidemiol. 1995 Nov;48(11):1407-12 - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources