Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 1998 Mar 1;14(4):347-52.
doi: 10.1089/aid.1998.14.347.

Differences in reverse transcriptase activity versus p24 antigen detection in cell culture, when comparing a homogeneous group of HIV type 1 subtype B viruses with a heterogeneous group of divergent strains

Affiliations
Comparative Study

Differences in reverse transcriptase activity versus p24 antigen detection in cell culture, when comparing a homogeneous group of HIV type 1 subtype B viruses with a heterogeneous group of divergent strains

G E Corrigan et al. AIDS Res Hum Retroviruses. .

Abstract

Failure to detect infection with HIV-1 non-B subtypes in some antibody screening assays has been shown. To date, however, no studies have been published evaluating the capacity of standard tests to quantify replication of divergent HIV-1 in cell culture. Reverse transcriptase (RT) activity and p24 antigen assays are the two methods most commonly used for this purpose. A homogeneous panel of HIV-1 subtype B viruses from northern Italy and a heterogeneous panel of diverse genetic subtypes (A to F and O) from different regions of the world were cultured under identical conditions. A new nonradioactive RT assay was used as a basis for comparison to evaluate the capacity of two p24 assays to quantify viral growth in both panels. Comparison of the p24 amount/RT activity (p24/RT) ratios showed that ratios in the subtype B panel tended to be markedly higher than in the diverse subtype panel. Greatest variation was seen with one of the subtype O isolates, where up to a 400 times lower ratio was obtained compared with the average ratio for the subtype B panel. In addition, one Thai subtype B virus also gave a markedly reduced ratio. Furthermore, comparison between the two p24 assays showed different abilities to detect p24 from different HIV-1 isolates. We discuss limitations for the use of anti-HIV-1 p24 antibodies produced by immunization with subtype B p24 in p24 assays.

PubMed Disclaimer

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources