Integration and interference in the cerebral hemispheres: relations with hemispheric specialization
- PMID: 9520310
- DOI: 10.1006/brcg.1997.0949
Integration and interference in the cerebral hemispheres: relations with hemispheric specialization
Abstract
The two hemispheres of the brain often perform complementary computations and make unique contributions to task performance. This study examines the interaction of linguistic (left hemisphere) and prosodic (right hemisphere) information in speech processing. An individual differences approach is used in which interference between linguistic and prosodic processes in a Stroop-like task is compared between individuals who process the two dimensions in opposite hemispheres (complementary specialization) vs. those who process both dimensions in the same hemisphere (noncomplementary specialization). Complementarity was not related to interference in any way. This finding is consistent with the hypothesis of Chiarello and Maxfield (1996) that interference is equivalent between and within hemispheres when it arises in a response selection stage.
Copyright 1998 Academic Press.
Similar articles
-
Hemispheric specialization for linguistic processing of sung speech.Percept Mot Skills. 2009 Feb;108(1):219-28. doi: 10.2466/PMS.108.1.219-228. Percept Mot Skills. 2009. PMID: 19425463
-
Complementarity of linguistic and prosodic processes in the intact brain.Brain Lang. 2001 Dec;79(3):473-81. doi: 10.1006/brln.2001.2502. Brain Lang. 2001. PMID: 11781054
-
Lateralization of speech processing in the brain as indicated by mismatch negativity and dichotic listening.Brain Cogn. 2000 Jun-Aug;43(1-3):392-8. Brain Cogn. 2000. PMID: 10857733
-
The nature of hemispheric specialization for linguistic and emotional prosodic perception: a meta-analysis of the lesion literature.Neuropsychologia. 2011 Nov;49(13):3722-38. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2011.09.028. Epub 2011 Sep 21. Neuropsychologia. 2011. PMID: 21964199 Review.
-
Affective and linguistic processing of speech prosody: DC potential studies.Prog Brain Res. 2006;156:269-84. doi: 10.1016/S0079-6123(06)56014-5. Prog Brain Res. 2006. PMID: 17015085 Review.
Cited by
-
Lateralization of visuospatial attention across face regions varies with emotional prosody.Brain Cogn. 2009 Feb;69(1):108-15. doi: 10.1016/j.bandc.2008.06.002. Epub 2008 Jul 17. Brain Cogn. 2009. PMID: 18639372 Free PMC article.
-
Rethinking motor lateralization: specialized but complementary mechanisms for motor control of each arm.PLoS One. 2013;8(3):e58582. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0058582. Epub 2013 Mar 5. PLoS One. 2013. PMID: 23472210 Free PMC article.
-
Emotional speech processing at the intersection of prosody and semantics.PLoS One. 2012;7(10):e47279. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0047279. Epub 2012 Oct 31. PLoS One. 2012. PMID: 23118868 Free PMC article.
-
The Face-to-Face Light Detection Paradigm: A New Methodology for Investigating Visuospatial Attention Across Different Face Regions in Live Face-to-Face Communication Settings.Interact Stud. 2010 Jan 1;11(2):336-348. doi: 10.1075/is.11.2.22tho. Interact Stud. 2010. PMID: 21113354 Free PMC article.
-
The effects of brain lateralization on motor control and adaptation.J Mot Behav. 2012;44(6):455-69. doi: 10.1080/00222895.2012.747482. J Mot Behav. 2012. PMID: 23237468 Free PMC article. Review.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources