Junior faculty members' mentoring relationships and their professional development in U.S. medical schools
- PMID: 9526459
- DOI: 10.1097/00001888-199803000-00021
Junior faculty members' mentoring relationships and their professional development in U.S. medical schools
Abstract
Purpose: To determine (1) the prevalence of mentoring relationships for U.S. medical school junior faculty; (2) the quality of these mentoring relationships; (3) any variation by gender or race; and (4) the relationship between mentoring and junior faculty members' perceptions of institutional professional support; research-, teaching-, and clinical-skills development; allocation of time to professional activities; and career satisfaction.
Method: In 1995 a 177-item survey was mailed to 3,013 full-time faculty at 24 randomly selected U.S. medical schools stratified on an area of medical specialization, graduation cohort, and gender. Mentoring was defined as "dynamic reciprocal relationship between an advanced career incumbent (the mentor) and a junior faculty member (the protégé) aimed at fostering the development of the junior person/protégé." Because mentoring is most crucial for junior faculty, the study focused on mentoring relationships within the previous three years ("recent mentoring") for faculty who were not full professors. Chisquare tests, analysis of variance, and principal-components analysis were used to analyze the data.
Results: In all, 1,808 (60%) of the 3,013 faculty surveyed, of whom 72% were junior faculty, returned completed questionaires. Fifty-four percent of the junior faculty had had a recent mentoring relationship. There was no significant difference between the men and the women faculty or between majority and minority faculty in the prevalence and quality of the mentoring relationships. The faculty with mentors rated their research preparation and research skills higher than did the faculty without mentors. Most of the women faculty (80%) and the minority faculty (86%) who had had mentors reported that it was not important to have a mentor of the same gender or minority group.
Conclusion: Mentoring relationships are prevalent in academic medicine and should be promoted to support the career growth of junior faculty.
Similar articles
-
Mentoring and the career satisfaction of male and female academic medical faculty.Acad Med. 2014 Feb;89(2):301-11. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0000000000000109. Acad Med. 2014. PMID: 24362376 Free PMC article.
-
Independent investigator incubator (I3): a comprehensive mentorship program to jumpstart productive research careers for junior faculty.BMC Med Educ. 2018 Aug 6;18(1):186. doi: 10.1186/s12909-018-1290-3. BMC Med Educ. 2018. PMID: 30081899 Free PMC article.
-
Mentoring program for minority faculty at the University of Pennsylvania School of Medicine.Acad Med. 1999 Apr;74(4):376-9. doi: 10.1097/00001888-199904000-00029. Acad Med. 1999. PMID: 10219215
-
The power of junior faculty mentoring committees.J Cell Physiol. 2024 Jul;239(7):e31360. doi: 10.1002/jcp.31360. Epub 2024 Jul 4. J Cell Physiol. 2024. PMID: 38962842 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Mentoring for clinician-educators.Acad Emerg Med. 2004 Dec;11(12):1346-50. doi: 10.1197/j.aem.2004.07.009. Acad Emerg Med. 2004. PMID: 15576527 Review.
Cited by
-
A National Survey of Mentoring Practices for Young Investigators in Circulatory and Respiratory Health.Can Respir J. 2016;2016:5260134. doi: 10.1155/2016/5260134. Epub 2016 Feb 29. Can Respir J. 2016. PMID: 27445544 Free PMC article.
-
Characteristics of mentoring relationships formed by medical students and faculty.Med Educ Online. 2012 Sep 13;17(1):17242. doi: 10.3402/meo.v17i0.17242. Med Educ Online. 2012. PMID: 22989620 Free PMC article.
-
Radiation Oncology AcaDemic Mentorship Program (ROADMAP) for Junior Faculty: One-Year Results of a Prospective Single Institution Initiative.Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2022 Sep 1;114(1):21-29. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2022.05.012. Epub 2022 May 26. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2022. PMID: 35644504 Free PMC article.
-
The Junior Faculty Laboratory: an innovative model of peer mentoring.Acad Med. 2011 Dec;86(12):1577-82. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0b013e31823595e8. Acad Med. 2011. PMID: 22030756 Free PMC article.
-
How to Choose a Mentor?J Curr Glaucoma Pract. 2013 Sep-Dec;7(3):128-9. doi: 10.5005/jp-journals-10008-1150. Epub 2013 Sep 6. J Curr Glaucoma Pract. 2013. PMID: 26997796 Free PMC article. Review.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources