Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Clinical Trial
. 1998 Mar 7;316(7133):731-5.
doi: 10.1136/bmj.316.7133.731.

Ultrasound treatment for treating the carpal tunnel syndrome: randomised "sham" controlled trial

G R Ebenbichler  1 , K L Resch, P Nicolakis, G F Wiesinger, F Uhl, A H Ghanem, V Fialka
Affiliations
Clinical Trial

Ultrasound treatment for treating the carpal tunnel syndrome: randomised "sham" controlled trial

G R Ebenbichler et al. BMJ. .

Abstract

Objective: To assess the efficacy of ultrasound treatment for mild to moderate idiopathic carpal tunnel syndrome.

Design: Randomised, double blind, "sham" controlled trial with assessments at baseline, after 2 weeks' and 7 weeks' treatment, and at a follow up assessment 6 months later (8 months after baseline evaluation).

Setting: Outpatient clinic of a university department of physical medicine and rehabilitation in Vienna.

Subjects: 45 patients with mild to moderate bilateral carpal tunnel syndrome as verified by electroneurography.

Intervention: 20 sessions of ultrasound (active) treatment (1 MHz, 1.0 W/cm2, pulsed mode 1:4, 15 minutes per session) applied to the area over the carpal tunnel of one wrist, and indistinguishable sham ultrasound treatment applied to the other. The first 10 treatments were performed daily (5 sessions/week); 10 further treatments were twice weekly for 5 weeks.

Main outcome measures: Score of subjective symptom ratings assessed by visual analogue scale; electroneurographic measures (for example, motor distal latency and sensory antidromic nerve conduction velocity).

Results: Improvement was significantly more pronounced in actively treated than in sham treated wrists for both subjective symptoms (P < 0.001, paired t test) and electroneurographic variables (motor distal latency P < 0.001, paired t test; sensory antidromic nerve conduction velocity P < 0.001, paired t test). Effects were sustained at 6 months' follow up.

Conclusion: Results suggest there are satisfying short to medium term effects due to ultrasound treatment in patients with mild to moderate idiopathic carpal tunnel syndrome. Findings need to be confirmed, and ultrasound treatment will have to be compared with standard conservative and invasive treatment options.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Trial profile
Figure 2
Figure 2
Mean change (and 95% confidence intervals) from baseline score for all subjective symptoms (active versus sham treatment) at week 2, end of treatment, and 6 months’ follow up (paired t test)
See this image and copyright information in PMC

Comment in

References

    1. Diagnosis of the carpal tunnel syndrome [editorial]. Lancet 1985;i:854-8. - PubMed
    1. Dawson DM. Entrapment neuropathies of the upper extremities. N Engl J Med. 1993;329:2013–2018. - PubMed
    1. Cotton P. Symptoms may return after carpal tunnel surgery. JAMA. 1991;265:1921–1922. - PubMed
    1. O’Malley MJ, Evanoff M, Terrono AL, Millender LH. Factors that determine reexploration treatment of carpal tunnel syndrome. J Hand Surg (Am) 1992;17:638–641. - PubMed
    1. Barnett SB, Ter Haar GR, Ziskin MC, Nyborg WL, Maeda K, Bang J. Current status of research on biophysical effects of ultrasound. Ultrasound Med Biol. 1994;20:205–218. - PubMed

Publication types