Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Clinical Trial
. 1998 Mar;43(3):254-60.
doi: 10.1002/(sici)1097-0304(199803)43:3<254::aid-ccd3>3.0.co;2-8.

ECG-gated versus nongated three-dimensional intracoronary ultrasound analysis: implications for volumetric measurements

Affiliations
Clinical Trial

ECG-gated versus nongated three-dimensional intracoronary ultrasound analysis: implications for volumetric measurements

N Bruining et al. Cathet Cardiovasc Diagn. 1998 Mar.

Abstract

The quantitative analysis of a three-dimensional (3-D) intracoronary ultrasound (ICUS) image data set permits a more comprehensive assessment of coronary arterial segments. The 3-D image sets are generally acquired during continuous motorized pullbacks. However, the cyclic changes of vascular dimensions and the cyclic spatial displacement of the ICUS transducer relative to the vessel wall can result in characteristic image artifacts, which may limit the applicability of quantitative automated analysis systems. This limitation may be overcome by an ECG-gated image acquisition. In the present study we acquired in vivo (1) nongated and (2) ECG-gated 3-D ICUS image sets of 15 human atherosclerotic coronary arteries and performed a computer-assisted contour detection of the lumen and total vessel boundaries. Total vessel and lumen volumes measured significantly larger in the nongated versus ECG-gated end-diastolic image sets (753+/-307 mm3 vs. 705+/-305 mm3; 411+/-154 mm3 vs. 388+/-165 mm3, both: P < 0.05). Both end-diastolic and systolic measurements were available in nine arteries, showing a larger total vessel and lumen volume at systole (664+/-221 mm3 vs. 686+/-227 mm3, P=0.03; 384+/-164 mm3 vs. 393+/-170 mm3, P=0.08). The differences observed may be of particular interest for volumetric ICUS studies, addressing presumably small differences in vessel or lumen dimensions.

PubMed Disclaimer

Comment in

  • What's new with IVUS?
    Tobis JM. Tobis JM. Cathet Cardiovasc Diagn. 1998 Mar;43(3):261. doi: 10.1002/(sici)1097-0304(199803)43:3<261::aid-ccd4>3.0.co;2-7. Cathet Cardiovasc Diagn. 1998. PMID: 9535360 No abstract available.

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources