Feature asymmetries in visual search: effects of display duration, target eccentricity, orientation and spatial frequency
- PMID: 9536360
- DOI: 10.1016/s0042-6989(97)00152-1
Feature asymmetries in visual search: effects of display duration, target eccentricity, orientation and spatial frequency
Abstract
In Experiments 1-3, we monitored search performance as a function of target eccentricity under display durations that either allowed or precluded eye movements. The display was present either until observers responded, for 104 msec, or for 62 msec. In all three experiments an orientation asymmetry emerged: observers detected a tilted target among vertical distracters more efficiently than a vertical target among vertical distracters. As target eccentricity increased, reaction times and errors augmented, and the set size effect became more pronounced, more so for vertical than tilted targets. In Experiments 4-7, the stimulus spatial properties were manipulated: spatial frequency; size; and orientation. The eccentricity effect was more pronounced for vertical than tilted targets and for high- than low-spatial frequency targets. This effect was eliminated when either the size, the size and orientation, or the size and spatial frequency were magnified (M-cortical factor). By increasing the signal-to-noise ratio, magnification reduced the extent of both asymmetries; it aided more the detection of tilted than vertical and of high- than low-spatial frequency targets. Experiments 4-7 indicate that performance improvement in the magnified conditions was due to the specific pairing of stimulus size with retinal eccentricity and not to the larger stimulus size of the magnified conditions. We conclude that stimulus size, orientation and spatial frequency influence the extent of the eccentricity effect and the efficiency of search performance.
Similar articles
-
Characterizing visual performance fields: effects of transient covert attention, spatial frequency, eccentricity, task and set size.Spat Vis. 2001;15(1):61-75. doi: 10.1163/15685680152692015. Spat Vis. 2001. PMID: 11893125 Free PMC article.
-
The eccentricity effect: target eccentricity affects performance on conjunction searches.Percept Psychophys. 1995 Nov;57(8):1241-61. doi: 10.3758/bf03208380. Percept Psychophys. 1995. PMID: 8539099
-
The effects of eccentricity and spatial frequency on the orientation discrimination asymmetry.Spat Vis. 1998;11(4):349-66. doi: 10.1163/156856898x00077. Spat Vis. 1998. PMID: 9749985
-
Cortical magnification neutralizes the eccentricity effect in visual search.Vision Res. 1997 Jan;37(1):63-82. doi: 10.1016/s0042-6989(96)00102-2. Vision Res. 1997. PMID: 9068831
-
Polar angle asymmetries in visual perception and neural architecture.Trends Neurosci. 2023 Jun;46(6):445-458. doi: 10.1016/j.tins.2023.03.006. Epub 2023 Apr 6. Trends Neurosci. 2023. PMID: 37031051 Free PMC article. Review.
Cited by
-
How important is lateral masking in visual search?Exp Brain Res. 2006 Apr;170(3):387-402. doi: 10.1007/s00221-005-0221-9. Epub 2005 Nov 23. Exp Brain Res. 2006. PMID: 16328267
-
Unconscious perception of a flash can trigger line motion illusion.Exp Brain Res. 2009 Feb;192(4):605-13. doi: 10.1007/s00221-008-1564-9. Epub 2008 Sep 25. Exp Brain Res. 2009. PMID: 18815776
-
Visual performance fields: frames of reference.PLoS One. 2011;6(9):e24470. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0024470. Epub 2011 Sep 8. PLoS One. 2011. PMID: 21931727 Free PMC article.
-
Characterizing visual performance fields: effects of transient covert attention, spatial frequency, eccentricity, task and set size.Spat Vis. 2001;15(1):61-75. doi: 10.1163/15685680152692015. Spat Vis. 2001. PMID: 11893125 Free PMC article.
-
The effects of task difficulty on visual search strategy in virtual 3D displays.J Vis. 2013 Aug 28;13(3):24. doi: 10.1167/13.3.24. J Vis. 2013. PMID: 23986539 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Research Materials