Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Multicenter Study
. 1998 Jan;78(1):F62-6.
doi: 10.1136/fn.78.1.f62.

Consequences for fetus and neonate of maternal red cell allo-immunisation

Affiliations
Multicenter Study

Consequences for fetus and neonate of maternal red cell allo-immunisation

H Howard et al. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed. 1998 Jan.

Abstract

Aims: To study the distribution of clinically important red cell antibodies in pregnancy, and the associated fetal and neonatal morbidity and mortality.

Methods: The case notes of women with clinically important red cell antibodies identified in their serum during pregnancy were reviewed.

Results: During a 12 month period 22,264 women were referred for antenatal screening. Clinically important red cell antibodies were detected in 244 (1%). Of these, 100 were anti-D and 144 were non-RhD antibodies. There were three intrauterine deaths, three fetuses required intrauterine transfusion, 10 neonates were transfused, 27 others had phototherapy, and 27 with a positive direct antiglobulin test received no treatment. Early fetal losses occurred in the presence of both high and low levels of anti-D.

Conclusions: Anti-D remains the most common clinically important antibody in pregnancy, and accounts for the greatest fetal and neonatal morbidity and mortality. Of the other antibodies detected, anti-c was associated with most neonatal morbidity. The production of many of the non-D antibodies detected could be avoided by the use of selected red cells when transfusing pre-menopausal women.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. J R Coll Physicians Lond. 1994 Jul-Aug;28(4):310-1 - PubMed
    1. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 1995 Oct;74(9):687-92 - PubMed
    1. Vox Sang. 1996;71(2):108-12 - PubMed
    1. Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 1997 Jan;104(1):37-41 - PubMed
    1. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1994 Jul;171(1):247-52 - PubMed

Publication types