Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 1976 Aug 3;21(1):37-45.
doi: 10.1007/BF02547381.

Bone in dermatosparaxis. II. Chemical analysis

Bone in dermatosparaxis. II. Chemical analysis

B Nusgens et al. Calcif Tissue Res. .

Abstract

Physical and chemical analysis of the organic matrix of dermatosparactic (D-) bone was performed to evaluate the implication of an alteration in the mechanical properties of procollagen fibers in the process of calcification. The D-diaphyseal bone contained less collagen and more hydroxyapatite than normal (N-) calf bone. Fractionated by centrifugation in a density gradient, D-bone was found to be composed of more than 80% weight of a highly calcified fraction while N-bone of the same age contained only 37% of this fraction. As compared to N-bone, the amount of organic matrix per unit volume of D-bone was increased in the least calcified fractions and reduced in the most mineralized ones. The newly formed matrix of D-bone contained an amount of collagen similar to the N-bone while the concentration of other glycoproteins was higher. Calcification was accompanied, in both types of bone, by a progressive reduction of glycoproteins and collagen; the diminution of collagen was higher in D- than in N-bone. The presence in D-bone of procollagen fibers with altered mechanical properties might be responsible for an excess of glycoproteins in the newly formed matrix. Calcium salt deposition in this matrix and progressive distension of the fibrous framework are two possible mechanisms by which hypercalcification of D-bone occurs.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Radiat Res. 1959 Feb;10(2):234-42 - PubMed
    1. J Biol Chem. 1955 Jan;212(1):335-43 - PubMed
    1. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1972;88:252-74 - PubMed
    1. Biochem J. 1956 Feb;62(2):315-23 - PubMed
    1. Eur J Biochem. 1971 Dec 10;23(3):533-43 - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources