Reconstruction of neck burns. A long-term comparative study between skin grafts, skin expansion and free flaps

Abstract

Cervical reconstruction after postburn scarring remains a challenge for the plastic surgeon. Several well-known procedures are possible: split or full-thickness skin grafts, local flaps, free skin flaps, expanded skin,... In order to evaluate each technique, three procedures are compared with a long-term follow-up (> or = 1 year): skin expansion, free flap surgery and full-thickness skin grafting. Fifteen patients are reviewed, with five patients operated according to each method. In this study, each burn patient was suffering from a severe neck burn contracture, restricting the neck motility to a few degrees. These patients were operated on by different surgeons, according to their personal indications. The full-thickness skin graft is usually harvested from the abdomen (by means of a miniabdominoplasty) and is applied under a tie-over dressing. This simple procedure has few complications and gives satisfactory results. Skin expansion provides a good texture and color matching but has a higher morbidity and necessitates several procedures. Free flap surgery is time-consuming, gives a good functional result but poor cosmetic aspect (different colour, excessive bulk). Comparing the functional and aesthetic result of the three types of reconstruction in terms of morbidity, neck mobility, skin elasticity, skin sensitivity, matching and scar recurrence, full-thickness skin grafting seems to be the most adequate technique.