Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 1998 Apr 14;95(8):4499-503.
doi: 10.1073/pnas.95.8.4499.

Unique molecular surface features of in vivo tolerized T cells

Affiliations

Unique molecular surface features of in vivo tolerized T cells

C C Maier et al. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. .

Abstract

Differential expression of surface markers can frequently be used to distinguish functional subsets of T cells, yet a surface phenotype unique to T cells induced into an anergic state has not been described. Here, we report that CD4 T cells rendered anergic in vivo by superantigen can be identified by loss of the 6C10 T cell marker. Inoculation of Vbeta8.1 T cell antigen receptor (TCR) transgenic mice with a Vbeta8.1-reactive minor lymphocyte-stimulating superantigen (Mls-1(a)) induces tolerance to Mls-1(a) by clonal anergy. CD4 lymph node T cells from Mls-1(a) inoculated transgenic mice enriched for the 6C10(-) phenotype neither proliferate nor produce interleukin-2 upon TCR engagement, whereas 6C10(+) CD4 T cells retain responsiveness. Analysis of T cell memory markers demonstrate that 6C10(-) T cells remain 3G11(hi) but express heterogeneous levels of CD45RB, CD62L, CD44, and the CD69 early activation marker, suggesting that T cells at various degrees of activation can be functionally anergic. These studies demonstrate that anergic T cells can be purified based on 6C10 expression permitting examination of issues concerning biochemical and biological features specific to T cell anergy.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Analysis of changes in 6C10 and 3G11 expression on tolerant CD4 lymph node T cells. Vβ8.1 transgenic mice were tolerized by inoculating with Mls-1a prior to days indicated, and expression of 6C10 and 3G11 on purified CD4 lymph node T cells was determined by flow cytometry, gating on CD4+ and TO-PRO-3 cells. The percent of 6C10+ and 3G11hi CD4 T cells is indicated by the number above the brackets. Representative flow cytometry profiles are shown.
Figure 2
Figure 2
6C10, but not 3G11, down-modulation on CD4 T cells is correlated with duration of tolerance to Mls-1a. (Upper) Percent of 6C10+ (○) and 3G11hi (•) CD4 T cells as determined by flow cytometry, on the days indicated after Mls-1a inoculation (day 120 data not shown). (Lower) Proliferation of purified CD4 T cells in response to Mls-1a in vitro. Results are expressed as stimulation indices of responses to CBA/J stimulators (day 0 T cells, which incorporated approximately 80,000 cpm) divided by responses to syngeneic CBA/Ca stimulators and represent averages ± SEM of four experiments.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Modulation of 6C10 and 3G11 expression on Mls-1a reactive CD4 lymph node T cells from nontransgenic mice after administering Mls-1a parallels changes in 6C10 and 3G11 expression in Vβ8.1 transgenic mice. Nontransgenic CBA/CaH mice were inoculated with Mls-1a prior to the day indicated and percent of Vβ6+ (□) and Vβ14+ (♦) T cells (Top); Vβ6+ and Vβ14+ T cells expressing 6C10 (Middle) and 3G11 (Bottom) determined by flow cytometry.
Figure 4
Figure 4
6C10 CD4 lymph node T cells from Mls-1a inoculated Vβ8.1 transgenic mice are found to be functionally anergic. CD4 T cells from tolerant mice were purified into 6C10 positive and negative populations by magnetic sorting and analyzed for 6C10, 3G11, and Vβ8.1 expression by flow cytometry (A), dose-dependent proliferation to anti-CD3 stimulation [uninoculated mice (□) and inoculated mice unsorted (⋄), purified 6C10 (○), and 6C10+ (▵) (B), dose-dependent proliferation to CBA/J stimulators (legend as for B except inoculated unsorted is not shown) (C), and proliferative response to phorbol 12-myristate 13-acetate/ionomycin (D). Representative data from experiments repeated four times are shown.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Schwartz R H. Science. 1990;248:1349–1356. - PubMed
    1. Webb S R, O’Rourke A M, Sprent J. Semin Immunol. 1992;4:329–336. - PubMed
    1. Kappler J W, Staerz U, White J, Marrack P C. Nature. 1988;332:35–40. - PubMed
    1. MacDonald H R, Schneider R, Lees R K, Howe R C, Acha-Orbea H, Festenstein H, Zinkernagel R M, Hengartner H. Nature (London) 1988;332:40–45. - PubMed
    1. Bhandoola A, Cho E A, Yui K, Saragovi H U, Greene M I, Quill H. J Immunol. 1993;151:2355–2367. - PubMed

Publication types

Substances