Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 1998 Feb;21(2):271-7.
doi: 10.2337/diacare.21.2.271.

Preserved endothelial function in IDDM patients, but not in NIDDM patients, compared with healthy subjects

Affiliations
Comparative Study

Preserved endothelial function in IDDM patients, but not in NIDDM patients, compared with healthy subjects

M D Enderle et al. Diabetes Care. 1998 Feb.

Abstract

Objective: To examine endothelial function (EF) noninvasively in IDDM and NIDDM patients with long diabetes duration.

Research design and methods: We studied EF in 17 IDDM patients without diabetic complications and in 25 NIDDM patients with comparable glycemic control and with diabetic complications and compared both with nondiabetic control subjects matched for age, sex, and lumen diameter. Using high-resolution ultrasound, we measured the endothelial-dependent (FAD%) and independent vasodilation (GTN%); the blood flow at rest, postocclusive, and after application of 400 micrograms glyceroltrinitrate of the branchial artery; and the intima media thickness (IMT) of the common carotid artery.

Results: In the IDDM patients, neither FAD% (8.2 +/- 4.6 vs. 7.6 +/- 4.2%), GTN% (16.3 +/- 4.9 vs. 18.4 +/- 6.4%), nor postocclusive blood flow (40.6 +/- 19.1 vs. 39.3 +/- 23.6 cm/s) differed from the control subjects. IMT (0.59 +/- 0.10 vs. 0.55 +/- 0.14 mm) was slightly, but not significantly, elevated. In contrast, the NIDDM patients showed an impaired FAD% (3.8 +/- 3.3 vs. 6.9 +/- 4.4%, P < 0.01), no difference in GTN%, and a decreased postocclusive blood flow (18.5 +/- 13.8 vs. 32.7 +/- 20.0 cm/s, P < 0.01). IMT was significantly increased in NIDDM patients (0.77 +/- 0.14 vs. 0.62 +/- 0.10 mm, P < 0.001).

Conclusions: In contrast to NIDDM patients with cardiovascular complications, IDDM patients with long diabetes duration and good long-term metabolic control do not have impaired EF compared with control subjects.

PubMed Disclaimer

Comment in

Publication types