Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 1996 Oct;9(5):199-202.

Physical properties of composites cured with conventional light or argon laser

Affiliations
  • PMID: 9545904
Comparative Study

Physical properties of composites cured with conventional light or argon laser

D S Cobb et al. Am J Dent. 1996 Oct.

Abstract

Purpose: To evaluate and compare diametral tensile strength (DTS), compressive strength (CS) and flexural strength (FS) of a hybrid and a microfill resin composite restorative material polymerized by an argon laser for 10 seconds (AL10) and 20 seconds (AL20) vs. a conventional visible light for 40 seconds (VL40).

Materials and methods: Five specimens of resin composite, Herculite XRV, shade A-2 and Durafill VS, shade B-2, were made for each set of physical properties tested, for a total of 18 groups and 90 specimens. ANSI/ADA Specification #27 for direct filling resins was used as the protocol for specimen preparation and physical properties testing. An argon laser at approximately 285 mW, 6 mm beam size, power density of approximately 1,000 mW/cm2, and a conventional visible light at approximately 470 mW, 13 mm beam size, power density of approximately 354 mW/cm2, were used to polymerize the composite. Samples were stored in water in light-proof containers at 37 degrees C for at least 7 days and then tested on a Zwick universal testing machine. Mean DTS, CS or FS (MPa) values were calculated for each group.

Results: Herculite XRV's physical properties were not significantly affected by light source or exposure time. Light source or exposure time had no significant effect on DTS for Durafill VS. Significantly lower FS was found for Durafill VS, when cured for 10 seconds with the argon laser compared to 20 seconds with the laser or 40 seconds with the conventional light. In addition, significantly lower CS was found for the Durafill VS when polymerized with the laser at 10 seconds compared to the conventional light at 40 seconds.

PubMed Disclaimer

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources