Step increment versus constant load tests for determination of maximal oxygen uptake

Abstract

Ten male subjects performed five maximal treadmill running tests at 7 mph. Tests included two (test-retest) progressive, step increment (2 1/2% grade elevation), discontinuous tests (DCT); a progressive, step increment, continuous test (ct) and two constant load tests (CL and CL +2 1/2%). A DCT test was performed first for establishment of peak elevation levels as constant load tests were performed at the peak elevation level attained (CL) and at a level 2 1/2% higher (CL + 2 1/2%). The second DCT test and the remaining three tests were administered randomly. Peak preformance capability (operationally defined as duration at highest grade elevation) was markedly reduced during progressive tests as compared with constant load tests. There was a similar reduction in peak performance capability during the CT test as compared with DCT test. Maximal oxygen uptake (VO2max) was quite similar among the various tests. It was concluded that VO2max attained during progressive, step increment, tests is unaffected by cumulative submaximal work. Discontinuous and continuous progressive tests provide similar VO2max results.