Improved tests for heterogeneity across a region of DNA sequence in the ratio of polymorphism to divergence
- PMID: 9549089
- DOI: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.molbev.a025934
Improved tests for heterogeneity across a region of DNA sequence in the ratio of polymorphism to divergence
Abstract
The neutral theory of molecular evolution predicts that the ratio of polymorphisms to fixed differences should be fairly uniform across a region of DNA sequence. Significant heterogeneity in this ratio can indicate the effects of balancing selection, selective sweeps, mildly deleterious mutations, or background selection. Comparing an observed heterogeneity statistic with simulations of the heterogeneity resulting from random phylogenetic and sampling variation provides a test of the statistical significance of the observed pattern. When simulated data sets containing heterogeneity in the polymorphism-to-divergence ratio are examined, different statistics are most powerful for detecting different patterns of heterogeneity. The number of runs is most powerful for detecting patterns containing several peaks of polymorphism; the Kolmogorov-Smirnov statistic is most powerful for detecting patterns in which one end of the gene has high polymorphism and the other end has low polymorphism; and a newly developed statistic, the mean sliding G statistic, is most powerful for detecting patterns containing one or two peaks of polymorphism with reduced polymorphism on either side. Nine out of 27 genes from the Drosophila melanogaster subgroup exhibit heterogeneity that is significant under at least one of these three tests, with five of the nine remaining significant after a correction for multiple comparisons, suggesting that detectable evidence for the effects of some kind of selection is fairly common.
Similar articles
-
Detecting non-neutral heterogeneity across a region of DNA sequence in the ratio of polymorphism to divergence.Mol Biol Evol. 1996 Jan;13(1):253-60. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.molbev.a025562. Mol Biol Evol. 1996. PMID: 8583898
-
Excess amino acid polymorphism in mitochondrial DNA: contrasts among genes from Drosophila, mice, and humans.Mol Biol Evol. 1996 Jul;13(6):735-48. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.molbev.a025634. Mol Biol Evol. 1996. PMID: 8754210
-
Mutation and selection at silent and replacement sites in the evolution of animal mitochondrial DNA.Genetica. 1998;102-103(1-6):393-407. Genetica. 1998. PMID: 9720291
-
Patterns of polymorphism and divergence from noncoding sequences of Drosophila melanogaster and D. simulans: evidence for nonequilibrium processes.Mol Biol Evol. 2005 Jan;22(1):51-62. doi: 10.1093/molbev/msh269. Epub 2004 Sep 29. Mol Biol Evol. 2005. PMID: 15456897 Review.
-
Theories for analyzing polymorphism data in duplicated genes.Genes Genet Syst. 2004 Apr;79(2):65-75. doi: 10.1266/ggs.79.65. Genes Genet Syst. 2004. PMID: 15215672 Review.
Cited by
-
Molecular population genetics of the beta-esterase gene cluster of Drosophila melanogaster.J Genet. 2003 Dec;82(3):115-31. doi: 10.1007/BF02715813. J Genet. 2003. PMID: 15133190
-
DNA polymorphism and selection at the bindin locus in three Strongylocentrotus sp. (Echinoidea).BMC Genet. 2016 May 12;17(1):66. doi: 10.1186/s12863-016-0374-5. BMC Genet. 2016. PMID: 27176219 Free PMC article.
-
Nucleotide variation at the dopa decarboxylase (Ddc) gene in natural populations of Drosophila melanogaster.J Genet. 2007 Aug;86(2):125-37. doi: 10.1007/s12041-007-0017-8. J Genet. 2007. PMID: 17968140
-
Applications of selective neutrality tests to molecular ecology.Mol Ecol. 2002 Aug;11(8):1245-62. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-294x.2002.01536.x. Mol Ecol. 2002. PMID: 12144648 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Contrasting evolutionary patterns in Drosophila immune receptors.J Mol Evol. 2006 Dec;63(6):769-80. doi: 10.1007/s00239-006-0005-2. Epub 2006 Nov 10. J Mol Evol. 2006. PMID: 17103056 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Molecular Biology Databases