Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 1998 Mar 21;316(7135):925-9.
doi: 10.1136/bmj.316.7135.925.

Urgency and priority for cardiac surgery: a clinical judgment analysis

F Kee  1 , P McDonald, J R Kirwan, C C Patterson, A H Love
Affiliations
Review

Urgency and priority for cardiac surgery: a clinical judgment analysis

F Kee et al. BMJ. .
No abstract available

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Case appraisal form
Figure 2
Figure 2
Frequency of demographic and clinical cues in decision models of urgency and priority. LVF=left ventricular function, LMS = left main stem stenosis
Figure 3
Figure 3
β Coefficients (unstandardised) for clinical cues in decision models of urgency and priority. Age=per decade, sex=men v women, smoking=smokers v non-smokers, body mass index=per additional 10% above ideal, stress test=high risk v not high risk, angina class=stable angina (grade IVb/c v Canadian Cardiovascular Society grade I/II, LVF=abnormal v normal left ventricular function, LMS=left main stem stenosis >75% v <50%, no of affected vessels=⩾3 affected v 0 or 1
See this image and copyright information in PMC

Comment in

Similar articles

See all similar articles

Cited by

See all "Cited by" articles

References

    1. Clinical Standards Advisory Group. Coronary artery bypass grafting and coronary angioplasty. Access to and availability of specialist services. London: HMSO; 1993.
    1. Naylor CD, Basinski A, Baigrie R, Goldman B, Lomas J. Placing patients in the queue for coronary revascularisation: evidence for practice variations from an expert panel process. Am J Public Health. 1990;80:1246–1252. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Naylor CD, Baigrie R, Goldman B, Basinski A. Assessment of priority for coronary revascularisation procedures. Lancet. 1990;335:1070–1073. - PubMed
    1. Naylor CD, Levinton C, Baigrie RS. Adapting to waiting lists for coronary revascularisation. Do Canadian specialists agree on which patients come first? Chest. 1992;101:715–722. - PubMed
    1. Hadorn DC, Holmes AC. The New Zealand priority criteria project. Part 2. Coronary artery bypass graft surgery. BMJ. 1997;314:135–138. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types