Jumbo cups and morsalized graft
- PMID: 9553570
- DOI: 10.1016/s0030-5898(05)70323-0
Jumbo cups and morsalized graft
Abstract
Revision of failed acetabular components presents a formidable problem due to associated loss of bone and sclerosis of the remaining bone. Uncemented acetabular components with porous surfaces have revolutionized acetabular revision surgery. They can be stabilized into the existing host bone with supplemental screws even in the face of major bone loss. Nonstructural particulate bone grafts can then be used to supplement the bone stock. With large defects, jumbo acetabular components ranging in sizes from 70 to 80 millimeter outer diameters can be stabilized on the acetabular rim while the defects can be grafted with morsalized bone. Nineteen of such revisions performed for major bone loss without pelvic discontinuity between February 1986 and December 1988 were evaluated at a mean follow-up period of ten years (range eight to eleven years). One component had been revised for sepsis. None of the others had been revised. Definite radiographic failure of fixation of the acetabular component was not seen on any of the other hips. These results strongly support the use of jumbo uncemented acetabular components with morsalized bone grafts even in the face of major acetabular bone loss.
Similar articles
-
Uncemented jumbo cups for revision total hip arthroplasty: a concise follow-up, at a mean of twenty years, of a previous report.J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2015 Feb 18;97(4):284-7. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.N.00798. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2015. PMID: 25695978
-
Medial protrusio technique for placement of a porous-coated, hemispherical acetabular component without cement in a total hip arthroplasty in patients who have acetabular dysplasia.J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1999 Jan;81(1):83-92. doi: 10.2106/00004623-199901000-00012. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1999. PMID: 9973058
-
Good implant survival after acetabular revision with extensive impaction bone grafting and uncemented components.Bone Joint J. 2020 Feb;102-B(2):198-204. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.102B2.BJJ-2019-0584.R2. Bone Joint J. 2020. PMID: 32009433
-
The use of a high-hip center in revision total hip arthroplasty.Semin Arthroplasty. 1995 Apr;6(2):103-8. Semin Arthroplasty. 1995. PMID: 10155686 Review.
-
Bone defect determines acetabular revision surgery.Hip Int. 2014 Oct 2;24 Suppl 10:S33-6. doi: 10.5301/hipint.5000162. Hip Int. 2014. PMID: 24970036 Review.
Cited by
-
Acetabular revision with metal mesh, impaction bone grafting, and a cemented cup.Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2008 Oct;466(10):2482-90. doi: 10.1007/s11999-008-0442-x. Epub 2008 Aug 13. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2008. PMID: 18704610 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
Radiographic evaluation of 19 patients with Paprosky 3A and 3B submitted to acetabular review with trabecular metal wedge.Rev Bras Ortop. 2017 Dec 6;53(1):94-100. doi: 10.1016/j.rboe.2017.11.008. eCollection 2018 Jan-Feb. Rev Bras Ortop. 2017. PMID: 29367913 Free PMC article.
-
A review of the treatment of pelvic discontinuity.HSS J. 2008 Sep;4(2):128-37. doi: 10.1007/s11420-008-9075-6. Epub 2008 Jul 15. HSS J. 2008. PMID: 18815856 Free PMC article.
-
Do jumbo cups cause hip center elevation in revision THA? A computer simulation.Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2014 Feb;472(2):572-6. doi: 10.1007/s11999-013-3169-2. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2014. PMID: 23884801 Free PMC article.
-
Results of the cementless Plasmacup in revision total hip arthroplasty: a retrospective study of 72 cases with an average follow-up of eight years.BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2010 May 27;11:101. doi: 10.1186/1471-2474-11-101. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2010. PMID: 20507578 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical