Comparison of microscopic epididymal sperm aspiration and intracytoplasmic sperm injection/in-vitro fertilization with repeat microscopic reconstruction following vasectomy: is second attempt vas reversal worth the effort?
- PMID: 9557844
- DOI: 10.1093/humrep/13.2.387
Comparison of microscopic epididymal sperm aspiration and intracytoplasmic sperm injection/in-vitro fertilization with repeat microscopic reconstruction following vasectomy: is second attempt vas reversal worth the effort?
Abstract
Since 1986, we have performed microscopic reconstruction in 18 men following failed microscopic vasectomy reversal. Between 1994 and 1996, nine couples have undergone microscopic epididymal sperm aspiration (MESA)/ intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) treatment for male infertility due either to congenital absence of the vas deferens (CAVD) or inoperable excurrent duct obstruction. We compared the cost efficiency of repeat vasectomy reversal to that for MESA combined with ICSI/in-vitro fertilization (ICSI/IVF). The cost of male partner procedures (vasectomy reversal, MESA) was based on physician and hospital charges, while the cost of ICSI/IVF included preparation of the female partner (medications and physician charges) and procedures (physician and hospital charges including oocyte retrieval, micromanipulation, and embryo transfer). Our cost examination does not include charges related to follow-up visits, prenatal monitoring, complications of pregnancy (i.e. miscarriage) or delivery in either group. Overall patency and pregnancy rates in the repeat vasectomy reversal group were 78 and 44% respectively. The cost per delivered baby (including multiple metachronos deliveries per couple) was $14892. Fertilization of oocytes has been achieved in 37/72 (51%) and pregnancies have occurred in 6/9 (67%) attempts and 5/9 (56%) report delivery. The average cost per pregnancy was $25637 and the average cost per delivered baby (or ongoing pregnancy) was $35570. The cost per delivery by MESA/ ICSI/IVF is 2.4 times the charges per delivery obtained through repeat vasectomy repair. Couples attempting to overcome infertility caused by vasal obstruction should be informed that vas reconstruction remains a cost effective means of re-establishing fertility even in men who have previously failed vasectomy reversal.
Similar articles
-
Vasoepididymostomy for vasectomy reversal: a critical assessment in the era of intracytoplasmic sperm injection.J Urol. 1997 Aug;158(2):467-70. doi: 10.1016/s0022-5347(01)64504-x. J Urol. 1997. PMID: 9224325 Clinical Trial.
-
Microsurgical vasovasostomy versus microsurgical epididymal sperm aspiration/testicular extraction of sperm combined with intracytoplasmic sperm injection. A cost-benefit analysis.Eur Urol. 2000 May;37(5):609-14. doi: 10.1159/000020201. Eur Urol. 2000. PMID: 10765102
-
Fertilizing capacity of epididymal and testicular sperm using intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI).Reprod Fertil Dev. 1995;7(2):281-92; discussion 292-3. doi: 10.1071/rd9950281. Reprod Fertil Dev. 1995. PMID: 7480847 Clinical Trial.
-
The best infertility treatment for vasectomized men: assisted reproduction or vasectomy reversal?Rev Hosp Clin Fac Med Sao Paulo. 2004 Oct;59(5):312-5. doi: 10.1590/s0041-87812004000500016. Epub 2004 Oct 29. Rev Hosp Clin Fac Med Sao Paulo. 2004. PMID: 15543406 Review.
-
Approaches for obtaining sperm in patients with male factor infertility.Fertil Steril. 1997 Jun;67(6):985-95. doi: 10.1016/s0015-0282(97)81428-8. Fertil Steril. 1997. PMID: 9176434 Review.
Cited by
-
The evolution and refinement of vasoepididymostomy techniques.Asian J Androl. 2013 Jan;15(1):49-55. doi: 10.1038/aja.2012.80. Epub 2012 Nov 19. Asian J Androl. 2013. PMID: 23160266 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Advances in surgical treatment of male infertility.World J Mens Health. 2012 Aug;30(2):108-13. doi: 10.5534/wjmh.2012.30.2.108. Epub 2012 Aug 31. World J Mens Health. 2012. PMID: 23596597 Free PMC article.
-
Factors predicting overall success: a review of 747 microsurgical vasovasostomies.Can Urol Assoc J. 2007 Nov;1(4):388-94. doi: 10.5489/cuaj.454. Can Urol Assoc J. 2007. PMID: 18542824 Free PMC article.
-
Two-suture single-armed longitudinal intussusception vasoepididymostomy for obstructive azoospermia: report of patients characteristics and outcome.Int Urol Nephrol. 2014 Dec;46(12):2271-7. doi: 10.1007/s11255-014-0835-6. Epub 2014 Sep 14. Int Urol Nephrol. 2014. PMID: 25218616
-
Obstructive azoospermia: reconstructive techniques and results.Clinics (Sao Paulo). 2013;68 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):61-73. doi: 10.6061/clinics/2013(sup01)07. Clinics (Sao Paulo). 2013. PMID: 23503955 Free PMC article. Review.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources